Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule

Abstract Three studies examined the role of the perceived typicalness of an out-group member on her effectiveness in improving evaluations of her group. Subjects were students at two adjacent colleges. In the first study they interacted with a member of the out-group college. The interaction was either pleasant or unpleasant, and the contact person either confirmed or disconfirmed several stereotypes of the out-group (typicalness manipulation). Subjects evaluated the out-group most favorably when they interacted with the typical-pleasant member of the out-group. The second study demonstrated that contact with a highly typical member is not beneficial if her typicalness is based on stereotypes that reflect negatively on the subject's in-group. Several explanations of the typicalness findings were considered in a third study. Support was found for the hypothesis that the more typical member is perceived to be more predictive of the personality and actions of other out-group members.

[1]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness , 1965 .

[2]  Cornelius Riordan.  Equal-status interracial contact: A review and revision of the concept. , 1978 .

[3]  M. Segall,et al.  TOWARDS THE ELIMINATION OF RACISM , 1976 .

[4]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[5]  D. Hamilton.  Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior , 1981 .

[6]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[7]  J. Crocker,et al.  Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs , 1983 .

[8]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members , 1982 .

[9]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice , 1979 .

[10]  Y. Amir,et al.  8 – The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations 1 , 1976 .

[11]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. , 1980 .

[12]  M. Snyder.  On the self-perpetuating nature of social stereotypes , 1981 .

[13]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[14]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Polarized appraisals of out-group members. , 1980 .

[15]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[16]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Group Categorization and Attribution of Belief Similarity , 1979 .

[17]  K. Dodge,et al.  Effects of confirmations and disconfirmations on stereotype-based attributions. , 1977 .

[18]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Empirical contributions: Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization , 1984 .

[19]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Intergroup contact with independent manipulations on in-group and out-group interaction. , 1980 .

[20]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Interracial Housing: A Psychological Evaluation of a Social Experiment , 1951 .