Nonuniform temporal weighting of interaural time differences in 500 Hz tones.

The discrimination and lateralization of interaural time differences (ITD) in rapidly modulated high-frequency sounds is dominated by cues present in the initial portion of the sound (i.e., at sound onset). The importance of initial ITD at low frequencies is, however, less clear. Here, ITD discrimination thresholds were measured in 500 Hz pure tones with diotic envelopes and static or dynamic fine-structure ITD. Static-ITD thresholds improved as tone duration increased from 40 to 640 ms but by an amount less than expected from uniform temporal weighting of binaural information. Dynamic conditions eliminated ITD from either the beginning or end of the sound by presenting slightly different frequencies to the two ears. While overall thresholds were lower when ITD was available at sound onset than when it was not, listeners differed appreciably in that regard. The results demonstrate that weighting of ITD is not temporally uniform. Instead, for many listeners, ITD discrimination at 500 Hz appears dominated by ITD cues present in the initial part of the sound. To a variable degree, other listeners rely more equally on ITD cues occurring near sound onsets and offsets, although no listeners appear to utilize such cues uniformly throughout the sound's duration.

[1]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[2]  Terry T Takahashi,et al.  The role of envelope shape in the localization of multiple sound sources and echoes in the barn owl. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Andrew D Brown,et al.  Temporal weighting of interaural time and level differences in high-rate click trains. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  G. Christopher Stecker,et al.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains , 2010, Hearing Research.

[6]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Stimulus-onset dominance in the perception of binaural information , 1994, Hearing Research.

[7]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Andrew D Brown,et al.  Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Mathias Dietz,et al.  Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R L Freyman,et al.  Onset dominance in lateralization. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  H. S. Colburn,et al.  An auditory‐nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high‐frequency complex stimuli , 1976 .

[12]  T Houtgast,et al.  Lateralization threshold of a signal in noise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H Kunov,et al.  Lateralization based on interaural phase differences: effects of frequency, amplitude, duration, and shape of rise/decay. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Lateralization of noise-burst trains based on onset and ongoing interaural delays. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Brian S. Nelson,et al.  Spatial Hearing in Echoic Environments: The Role of the Envelope in Owls , 2010, Neuron.

[16]  G. C. Stecker,et al.  Temporal weighting in sound localization. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Edward L. Bartlett,et al.  Neural representations of temporally modulated signals in the auditory thalamus of awake primates. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Andrew D Brown,et al.  Onset- and offset-specific effects in interaural level difference discrimination. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Human interaural time difference thresholds for sine tones: the high-frequency limit. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.