DCLM framework: understanding collaboration in open-ended tabletop learning environments

There is a growing understanding of the unique ways that tabletops support effective collaboration; however, this research mostly focuses on environments in which learners work towards a single shared goal. Underpinning this perspective, either implicitly or explicitly, is the theory that collaborative learning is a process of attaining convergent conceptual change. However, this model of collaboration may not apply to all scenarios where learners are working together. In particular, informal, open-ended exploratory environments support (and often promote) shared activities where the goal may not be for all participants to emerge with a single, shared understanding. There is increased interest in understanding the efficacy of designs that support (and encourage) learners to collaborate while seeking divergent goals, ideas, and conceptions. This paper advances a framework (Divergent Collaboration Learning Mechanisms - DCLM) for recognizing and coding collaboration and divergent learning in such environments. We apply the DCLM framework to an informal tabletop environment (Oztoc) as a means of highlighting how DCLM may reveal new productive interactions environments that support divergent forms of collaboration, mentorship, and learning. Analysis of participants’ interactions within Oztoc revealed that participants who have non-aligned goals can still productively collaborate, and in many cases can provide insight and feedback that would not be possible in shared-goal activities. We conclude with an examination of how open-ended exploratory environments can support communities of practice and legitimate peripheral participation, and the importance of divergent inquiry and divergent conceptual change across a range of learning environments.

[1]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  How pairs interact over a multimodal digital table , 2007, CHI.

[2]  S. Higgins,et al.  Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise , 2013 .

[3]  Bertrand Schneider,et al.  Physical space and division of labor around a tabletop tangible simulation , 2009, CSCL.

[4]  Christian Heath,et al.  Configuring 'Interactivity' , 2008 .

[5]  Philip Bell,et al.  Distributed Expertise in a Science Center: Social and Intellectual Role-Taking by Families , 2008 .

[6]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Taylor Martin,et al.  Using Learning Analytics to Understand the Learning Pathways of Novice Programmers , 2013 .

[8]  Leen Streefland,et al.  Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge , 2000 .

[9]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[10]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Cross-Community Design and Implementation of Engineering Tinkering Activities at a Science Center , 2013 .

[11]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaboration in a multi-user game: impacts of an awareness tool on mutual modeling , 2006, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[12]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[13]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[14]  Sara Price,et al.  What have you done! the role of 'interference' in tangible environments for supporting collaborative learning , 2009, CSCL.

[15]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild , 2015, CHI.

[16]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Using augmentations as bridges from concrete to abstract representations , 2009, BCS HCI.

[17]  Matthew Berland,et al.  Making, Tinkering, and Computational Literacy , 2016 .

[18]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Tangible programming in the classroom with tern , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions , 2009, IDC.

[20]  Anthony Collins,et al.  My Museum Tour: Collaborative Poster Creation During School Museum Visits , 2012 .

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[22]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[23]  Edwin Hutchins How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995 .

[24]  J. Falk An Identity‐Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning , 2006 .

[25]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .

[26]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces , 1987, TOIS.

[27]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Designing visible engineering: supporting tinkering performances in museums , 2015, IDC.

[28]  K. Crowley,et al.  Building Islands of Expertise in Everyday Family Activity , 2002 .

[29]  L. Roberts From Knowledge to Narrative: Educators and the Changing Museum , 1997 .

[30]  Randi Korn An Analysis of Differences between Visitors at Natural History Museums and Science Centers. , 1995 .

[31]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Fishing with friends: using tabletop games to raise environmental awareness in aquariums , 2015, IDC.

[32]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Analysing the mechanisms of common ground in collaborative web-based interaction , 2017 .

[33]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[34]  B. Bederson,et al.  Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children , 2000, CHI.

[35]  Tom Geller,et al.  Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in Museums and Galleries , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[36]  C. Kynigos,et al.  Applying a Constructionist Frame to Learning about Sustainability , 2012 .

[37]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[38]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[39]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent‐child activity , 2001 .

[40]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table , 2009, ITS '09.

[41]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks , 1999 .

[42]  Frédéric Vernier,et al.  Personal digital historian: story sharing around the table , 2003, INTR.

[43]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[44]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  Caretta: a system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces , 2004, CHI.

[45]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[46]  Philip Bell,et al.  Distributed Expertise in a Science Center , 2008 .

[47]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1995, NATO ASI Series.

[48]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[49]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input , 2008, CSCW.

[50]  Sara Price,et al.  Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[51]  Doris B. Ash Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum , 2003 .

[52]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media , 2009 .

[53]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Interactive tabletops in education , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[54]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[55]  B. Wilson Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[56]  Judy Kay,et al.  Collaborative concept mapping at the tabletop , 2010, ITS '10.

[57]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  To Disagree, We Must Also Agree: How Intersubjectivity Structures and Perpetuates Discourse in a Mathematics Classroom , 2006 .

[58]  Prasun Dewan,et al.  Flexible user interface coupling in a collaborative system , 1991, CHI.

[59]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in Society , 2005 .

[60]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware , 2004, CSCW.

[61]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Designing opportunistic user interfaces to support a collaborative museum exhibit , 2009, CSCL.

[62]  John H. Falk,et al.  Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition , 2005 .

[63]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Youtopia: a collaborative, tangible, multi-touch, sustainability learning activity , 2013, IDC.

[64]  Lawrence E. Whitman,et al.  Using legos to interest high school students and imtrove k12 stem education , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[65]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration , 2003, TCHI.

[66]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  Yiping Lou,et al.  Enhancing Project-Based Learning Through Online Between-Group Collaboration , 2004 .

[68]  Susan A. Yoon,et al.  Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[69]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  An empirical evaluation of touch and tangible interfaces for tabletop displays , 2010, TEI '10.

[70]  Joshua P. Gutwill,et al.  Research to Practice: Observing Learning in Tinkering Activities , 2015 .