TIGER2 with solvent energy averaging (TIGER2A): An accelerated sampling method for large molecular systems with explicit representation of solvent.

The recently developed "temperature intervals with global exchange of replicas" (TIGER2) accelerated sampling method is found to have inaccuracies when applied to systems with explicit solvation. This inaccuracy is due to the energy fluctuations of the solvent, which cause the sampling method to be less sensitive to the energy fluctuations of the solute. In the present work, the problem of the TIGER2 method is addressed in detail and a modification to the sampling method is introduced to correct this problem. The modified method is called "TIGER2 with solvent energy averaging," or TIGER2A. This new method overcomes the sampling problem with the TIGER2 algorithm and is able to closely approximate Boltzmann-weighted sampling of molecular systems with explicit solvation. The difference in performance between the TIGER2 and TIGER2A methods is demonstrated by comparing them against analytical results for simple one-dimensional models, against replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations for sampling the conformation of alanine dipeptide and the folding behavior of (AAQAA)3 peptide in aqueous solution, and by comparing their performance in sampling the behavior of hen egg-white lysozyme in aqueous solution. The new TIGER2A method solves the problem caused by solvent energy fluctuations in TIGER2 while maintaining the two important characteristics of TIGER2, i.e., (1) using multiple replicas sampled at different temperature levels to help systems efficiently escape from local potential energy minima and (2) enabling the number of replicas used for a simulation to be independent of the size of the molecular system, thus providing an accelerated sampling method that can be used to efficiently sample systems considered too large for the application of conventional temperature REMD.

[1]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[3]  L. Verlet,et al.  Molecular dynamics and time reversibility , 1993 .

[4]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Theoretical studies of medium effects on conformational equilibria , 1983 .

[5]  Robert A Latour,et al.  TIGER2: an improved algorithm for temperature intervals with global exchange of replicas. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Coupling of replica exchange simulations to a non-Boltzmann structure reservoir. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[7]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  S. Nosé A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble , 1984 .

[9]  Robert A. Latour,et al.  The temperature intervals with global exchange of replicas empirical accelerated sampling method: Parameter sensitivity and extension to a complex molecular system , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[11]  E. Stellwagen,et al.  Distribution of Helicity within the Model Peptide Acetyl(AAQAA)3amide , 1994 .

[12]  C. Brooks,et al.  Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: toward a consistent generalized Born force field. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Nadeem A. Vellore,et al.  An improved replica-exchange sampling method: temperature intervals with global energy reassignment. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[15]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[17]  H. Berendsen,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR MACROMOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND CONSTRAINT DYNAMICS , 1977 .

[18]  Kazuyuki Akasaka,et al.  Pressure-dependent changes in the solution structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[20]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[21]  L. Verlet Computer "Experiments" on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules , 1967 .

[22]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[23]  D. Ahn,et al.  Egg white proteins and their potential use in food processing or as nutraceutical and pharmaceutical agents--a review. , 2013, Poultry science.

[24]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[25]  Niel M. Henriksen,et al.  Reliable oligonucleotide conformational ensemble generation in explicit solvent for force field assessment using reservoir replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .