Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior

Past research has established that, while self-reports of purchase intentions can predict behavior, various factors affect the strength of the intentions-behavior link. This article explores one such factor: the impact of merely measuring intent. Our specific question concerns the impact of measuring intent on subsequent purchase behavior. Prior research suggests a mere-measurement hypothesis: that merely measuring intent will increase subsequent purchase behavior. We also suggest a polarization hypothesis: that repeated intent questions will have a polarizing effect on behavior. The results reveal that the effect of merely asking intent to buy once is an increase in the subsequent purchase rate. The effect of repeatedly asking intent for those with low levels of intent is a decreased propensity to buy with repeated measurements. These two effects are reduced given prior experience with the product. The implications of these findings and opportunities for future research are discussed.

[1]  A. Ehrenberg.  A Study of Some Potential Biases in The Operation of a Consumer Panel , 1960 .

[2]  J. Mcneil,et al.  Federal Programs to Measure Consumer Purchase Expectations, 1946–1973: A Post-Mortem , 1974 .

[3]  Murphy A. Sewall.  Market Segmentation Based on Consumer Ratings of Proposed Product Designs , 1978 .

[4]  G. Urban,et al.  Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology , 1978 .

[5]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[6]  D. Lehmann.  Market research and analysis , 1979 .

[7]  S. Sherman.  On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. , 1980 .

[8]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[9]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[10]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Social explanation: The role of timing, set, and recall on subjective likelihood estimates. , 1983 .

[11]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Availability and interference in predictive judgment. , 1984 .

[12]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The role of prior knowledge in explaining hypothetical events , 1985 .

[13]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[14]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[15]  William J. Infosino,et al.  Forecasting New Product Sales from Likelihood of Purchase Ratings , 1986 .

[16]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. , 1987 .

[17]  E. Blair,et al.  Cognitive Processes Used by Survey Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions , 1987 .

[18]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  KNOWING WHAT YOU WANT: MEASURING LABILE VALUES , 1988 .

[19]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[20]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[21]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[22]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[23]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[24]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[25]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of Repeated Expressions on Attitude Extremity , 1992 .

[26]  C. Allen,et al.  Effects of Multiple Measurement Operations on Consumer Judgment: Measurement Reliability Or Reactivity? , 1993 .