Remodeling the Brain With Behavioral Experience After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Behavioral experience can drive brain plasticity, but we lack sufficient knowledge to optimize its therapeutic use after stroke. Methods— We outline recent findings from rodent models of cortical stroke of how experiences interact with postinjury events to influence synaptic connectivity and functional outcome. We focus on upper extremity function. Results— After unilateral cortical infarcts, behavioral experiences shape neuronal structure and activity in both hemispheres. Experiences that matter include interventions such as skill training and constraint-like therapy as well as unguided behaviors such as learned nonuse and behavioral compensation. Lateralized behaviors have bihemispheric influences. Ischemic injury can alter the sensitivity of remaining neocortical neurons to behavioral change and this can have positive and negative functional effects. Conclusions— Because experience is ongoing in stroke survivors, a better understanding of its interaction with brain reorganization is needed so that it can be manipulated to improve function and prevent its worsening.

[1]  Theresa A. Jones,et al.  Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions , 2008, Experimental Neurology.

[2]  Randolph J Nudo,et al.  Cortical Brain Stimulation: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for Upper Limb Motor Recovery Following Stroke , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[3]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Animal models of neurological deficits: how relevant is the rat? , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  Jeffrey D. Riley,et al.  Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[6]  T. Jones,et al.  Experience--a double edged sword for restorative neural plasticity after brain damage. , 2008, Future neurology.

[7]  N. Young,et al.  Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat , 2003, Neurological research.

[8]  T. Jones,et al.  Maladaptive effects of learning with the less-affected forelimb after focal cortical infarcts in rats , 2008, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  T. Jones,et al.  Contralesional neural plasticity and functional changes in the less-affected forelimb after large and small cortical infarcts in rats , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[10]  T. Jones,et al.  Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Theresa A. Jones,et al.  Motor Enrichment and the Induction of Plasticity Before or After Brain Injury , 2003, Neurochemical Research.

[13]  R. Nudo Postinfarct Cortical Plasticity and Behavioral Recovery , 2007, Stroke.

[14]  Theresa A. Jones,et al.  The Vermicelli Handling Test: A simple quantitative measure of dexterous forepaw function in rats , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.