The New Anti-war Protests and Miscible Mobilizations

This paper analyzes the factors contributing to the relative success of the recent mobilizations against war despite the peace movement organizations' weakness and unfavorable political opportunity structures. I argue that these anti-war protests were shaped by two factors: first, by trigger events which created new grievances and, second, by the use of new information technologies such as the Internet. These factors contributed to what I call miscible mobilizations, or simultaneous mobilization efforts by movements with compatible ideologies and shared activist communities and SMOs. Results from an extensive study of the anti-war protests from September 2001 in the USA support this notion and call attention to the need to develop a synthesis between traditional resource mobilization, political process, and new social movement theories of mobilization and to focus research on the fluid processes of miscible mobilizations.

[1]  R. Ellis.  Culture Matters: Essays In Honor Of Aaron Wildavsky , 1997 .

[2]  Steven E. Barkan,et al.  The social movement society : contentious politics for a new century , 1999 .

[3]  V. Taylor.  SOCIAL MOVEMENT CONTINUITY: THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT IN ABEYANCE* , 1989 .

[4]  Jackie Smith,et al.  Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements , 2001 .

[5]  Bob Edwards.  Semiformal Organizational Structure Among Social Movement Organizations: An Analysis of the U.S. Peace Movement , 1994 .

[6]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Collective identity and activism: Networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. , 1992 .

[7]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .

[8]  D. S. Meyer.  Protest Cycles and Political Process: American Peace Movements in the Nuclear Age , 1993 .

[9]  C. Tilly.  From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[10]  Lawrence S. Wittner.  Rebels against war : the American peace movement, 1941-1960 , 1969 .

[11]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Dynamics of Contention , 2003 .

[12]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  MOBILIZATION AND PARTICIPATION: SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPANSIONS OF RESOURCE MOBILIZATION THEORY* , 1984 .

[13]  S. Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics , 1997 .

[14]  Mario Diani,et al.  Introduction: Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Networks: ‘From Metaphor to Substance ’? , 2003 .

[15]  Hanspeter Kriesi.  New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Organizational mortality in a declining social movement : the demise of peace movement organizations in the end of the Cold War era , 1995 .

[17]  R. Inglehart.  Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[18]  Thomas R. Rochon,et al.  Coalitions and Political Movements: The Lessons of the Nuclear Freeze , 1999 .

[19]  J. Lofland,et al.  Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s. , 1995 .

[20]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  S. Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics , 1994 .

[22]  Lawrence S. Wittner.  Rebels Against War: The American Peace Movement, 1933-1983 , 1969 .

[23]  Dieter Rucht,et al.  Towards a 'Movement Society'? On the possibilities of institutionalizing social movements , 2002 .

[24]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy , 2003 .

[25]  H. Johnston,et al.  Tales of Nationalism: Catalonia, 1939-1979 , 1991 .

[26]  P. Oliver,et al.  What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research , 2000 .

[27]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  F. Passy.  Social Networks Matter. But How , 2002 .

[29]  Sam Marullo.  Frame Changes and Social Movement Contraction: U.S. Peace Movement Framing After the Cold War , 1996 .

[30]  Edward J. Walsh,et al.  Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Riders in the TMI Area , 1983 .

[31]  Robert D. Benford.  Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement , 1993 .

[32]  Dirk Oegema,et al.  POTENTIALS, NETWORKS, MOTIVATIONS, AND BARRIERS: STEPS TOWARDS PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS * , 1987 .

[33]  R. Koopmans.  Globalization or Still National Politics? A Comparison of Protests against the Gulf War in Germany, France, and the Netherlands , 1999 .

[34]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action , 2003 .

[35]  Jürgen Gerhards,et al.  Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Mario Diani,et al.  Social Movements and Networks , 2003 .

[37]  J. Doenecke.  The American Peace Movement and Social Reform 1898–1918: Marchand, C. Roland: Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 441 pp., Publication Date: January 18, 1973 , 1973 .

[38]  Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s , 1993 .

[39]  Thomas R. Rochon.  Culture Moves , 1998 .

[40]  C. Chatfield,et al.  The American peace movement and social reform, 1898-1918 , 1973 .

[41]  Lorenzo Mosca,et al.  Global, noglobal this is…: what Genoa’s protest was about , 2004 .

[42]  D. S. Meyer,et al.  Social Movement Spillover , 1994 .

[43]  Doug McAdam.  Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .