Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results

The purposes of this study are to gain more insight into students’ actual preferences and perceptions of assessment, into the effects of these on their performances when different assessment formats are used, and into the different cognitive process levels assessed. Data were obtained from two sources. The first was the scores on the assessment of learning outcomes, consisting of open ended and multiple choice questions measuring the students’ abilities to recall information, to understand concepts and principles, and to apply knowledge in new situations. The second was the adapted Assessment Preferences Inventory (API) which measured students’ preferences as a pre-test and perceptions as a post-test. Results show that, when participating in a New Learning Environment (NLE), students prefer traditional written assessment and questions which are as closed as possible, assessing a mix of cognitive processes. Some relationships, but not all the expected ones, were found between students’ preferences and their assessment scores. No relationships were found between students’ perceptions of assessment and their assessment scores. Additionally, only forty percent of the students had perceptions of the levels of the cognitive processes assessed that matched those measured by the assessments. Several explanations are discussed.

[1]  David Nevo,et al.  School-based evaluation : a dialogue for school improvement , 1995 .

[2]  K. Scouller.  The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[3]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Mien Segers,et al.  Optimising new modes of assessment : in search of qualities and standards , 2003 .

[5]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Teachers' task demands, students' test expectations, and actual test content. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education , 2002 .

[7]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats , 1998 .

[8]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Students' experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations , 1994 .

[9]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Examination-type preferences of secondary school students and their teachers in the science disciplines , 1997 .

[10]  Mien Segers,et al.  The Era of Assessment Engineering: Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning and the Role of New Modes of Assessment , 2003 .

[11]  Mien S. R. Segers,et al.  Assessment in a Problem-Based Economics Curriculum , 1996 .

[12]  Effie Maclellan,et al.  Assessment for Learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students , 2001 .

[13]  D. Boud.  Assessment and the promotion of academic values , 1990 .

[14]  David Gijbels,et al.  The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes , 2005 .

[15]  Charles Chree,et al.  The Relationship between the , 1925 .

[16]  Mien Segers,et al.  New Assessment Forms in Problem-based Learning: The value-added of the students' perspective , 2001 .

[17]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[18]  F. Dochy,et al.  Assessment as a tool for learning , 1997 .

[19]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  New Insights Into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment , 2003 .

[20]  J. V. D. Linden,et al.  New Learning: Three Ways to Learn in a New Balance , 2000 .

[21]  M. Beller,et al.  Can Item Format (Multiple Choice vs. Open-Ended) Account for Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement? , 2000 .

[22]  Sally Brown,et al.  Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. , 1999 .

[23]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Toward adaptive assessment — The student's angle , 1994 .

[24]  W. Lens,et al.  The Evaluation Practice of Teachers as a Learning Opportunity for Students. , 2001 .

[25]  M. Birenbaum.  Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations , 1997 .

[26]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning in new learning environments: A replica study , 2008 .

[27]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in deaf and hearing students in higher education , 2004 .

[28]  Janine van der Rijt,et al.  Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of assessments: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficulty levels of assessment items , 2006 .

[29]  F. Dochy,et al.  The relationship between students' approaches to learning and learning outcomes , 2005 .

[30]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[31]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  Evaluating the Consequential Validity of New Modes of Assessment: The Influence of Assessment on Learning, Including Pre-, Post-, and True Assessment Effects , 2003 .

[32]  L. Shepard.  The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture , 2000 .

[33]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[34]  M. Zeidner.  Essay Versus Multiple-Choice Type Classroom Exams: The Student's Perspective. , 1987 .

[35]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Gender Differences in Multiple‐Choice Tests: The Role of Differential Guessing Tendencies , 1991 .

[36]  M. Birenbaum.  Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment , 1996 .