Steepest-first exploration with learning-based path evaluation: uncovering the design strategy of parameter analysis with C–K theory

The parameter analysis method of conceptual design is studied in this paper with the help of C–K theory. Each of the fundamental design activities—idea generation, implementation of the idea as hardware and evaluation—is explained and defined as a specific sequence of C–K operators. A case study of designing airborne decelerators is used to demonstrate the modeling of the parameter analysis process in C–K terms. The theory is used to explain how recovery from an initial fixation took place, leading to a breakthrough in the design process. It is shown that the innovative power of parameter analysis is based on C-space “de-partitioning” and that the efficient strategy exhibited by parameter analysis can be interpreted as steepest-first, controlled by an evaluation function of the design path. This logic is explained as generalization of branch-and-bound algorithms by a learning-based, dynamically evolving evaluation function and exploration of a state space that keeps changing during the actual process of designing.

[1]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Interpreting parameter analysis through the proto-theory of design , 2012 .

[2]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[3]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , 2013 .

[4]  Ehud Kroll STRUCTURED CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT WITH PARAMETER ANALYSIS , 2011 .

[5]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[6]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function — Behaviour — Structure Framework , 2004 .

[7]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Towards a New Logic for Front End Management: From Drug Discovery to Drug Design in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2007 .

[8]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[10]  Nfm Roozenburg,et al.  On the pattern of reasoning in innovative design , 1993 .

[11]  Akin Kazakçi,et al.  A MODEL OF CK DESIGN THEORY BASED ON TERM LOGIC: A FORMAL CK BACKGROUND FOR A CLASS OF DESIGN ASSISTANTS , 2008 .

[12]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[13]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Résumé of 12 years interdisciplinary empirical studies of engineering design in Germany , 1999 .

[14]  A.M.M. Sharif Ullah A fuzzy decision model for conceptual design , 2005 .

[15]  Sridhar S. Condoor,et al.  Innovative Conceptual Design: Theory and Application of Parameter Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Design theories as languages of the unknown: insights from the German roots of systematic design (1840–1960) , 2013 .

[17]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Strategic Management of Innovation and Design , 2010 .

[18]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. II. Practice , 2004 .

[19]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[20]  Sridhar S. Condoor,et al.  Innovative Conceptual Design by Ehud Kroll , 2001 .

[21]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[22]  David C. Brown,et al.  Engineering Design: Representation and Reasoning , 2012 .

[23]  Md. Mamunur Rashid,et al.  On some unique features of C–K theory of design , 2012 .

[24]  Ernest G. Cravalho,et al.  Technological Innovation in Education and Industry , 1980 .

[25]  Sridhar S. Condoor,et al.  Parameter analysis for the application of the principle of direct and short transmission path: a valve-actuator design case study , 2008 .

[26]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[27]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory , 2012 .

[28]  Offer Shai,et al.  Creativity and scientific discovery with infused design and its analysis with C–K theory , 2012, Research in Engineering Design.

[29]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[30]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Heuristics : intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving , 1984 .

[31]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design , 2003 .

[32]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Managing Innovation Fields in a Cross‐Industry Exploratory Partnership with C–K Design Theory* , 2010 .

[33]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[34]  Ehud Kroll,et al.  Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis , 2013 .

[35]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. I. Theory , 2004 .

[36]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Concept Exploration Through Morphological Charts: An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[37]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[38]  Fumihiko Kimura,et al.  Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications , 2009 .

[39]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[40]  Ozgur Eris Insisting on Truth at the Expense of Conceptualization: Can Engineering Portfolios Help?* , 2006 .