The Need for an Organizational Knowledge Management Strategy

Projects can cause organizations to perform in new ways resulting in the generation of knowledge. Project learning occurs when new knowledge is captured, disseminated, and used by the project team. Y2K utility projects were studied with respect to knowledge benefitsand management. Projects from developed countries using western technology were found to have knowledge benefits but their organizations were doing a poor job of capturing them. It was hypothesized that the failure to capture knowledge benefits was due to organizations nothaving an organizational knowledge management strategy. The respondents were surveyed with respect to their organization's knowledge strategy. The number of knowledge benefits and capture actions taken was compared between projects that had a knowledge strategy and those that did not. A significant correlation was found between the dependent variables and knowledge management strategy for those organizations having an organizational strategy both during Y2K and now. No significant correlation was found with those projects that had a strategy either during Y2K or now. Finally, types of capture actions taken were assessed using percent of respondents taking the capture action. Modifying existing processes and procedures was found to occur much more often in projects having a knowledge strategy. The implications are that project-based knowledge management systems, KMS, within organizations can successfully capture and transfer tacit knowledge without capturing context. However, organizations are much more likely to capture knowledge benefits if they have an organizational knowledge management strategy.

[1]  Steven A. Cavaleri ‘Soft’ Systems Thinking: A Pre-Condition for Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[2]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  An organizational learning perspective on information systems planning , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Danny Miller,et al.  A Preliminary Typology of Organizational Learning: Synthesizing the Literature , 1996 .

[4]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[5]  M. Easterby-Smith Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques , 1997 .

[6]  Joline Morrison,et al.  Organizational memory information systems: characteristics and development strategies , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  M. Dodgson Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[8]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational memory/knowledge effects on productivity, a longitudinal study , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[10]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  A Study of Knowledge Benefits Gained from Projects: The Electric Utility Industry Y2K Project Experience , 2002 .

[11]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Mark Weiser,et al.  A research framework for empirical studies in organizational memory , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..