Matching identifiers in electronic health records: implications for duplicate records and patient safety

Objective To quantify the percentage of records with matching identifiers as an indicator for duplicate or potentially duplicate patient records in electronic health records in five different healthcare organisations, describe the patient safety issues that may arise, and present solutions for managing duplicate records or records with matching identifiers. Methods For each institution, we retrieved deidentified counts of records with an exact match of patient first and last names and dates of birth and determined the number of patient records existing for the top 250 most frequently occurring first and last name pairs. We also identified methods for managing duplicate records or records with matching identifiers, reporting the adoption rate of each across institutions. Results The occurrence of matching first and last name in two or more individuals ranged from 16.49% to 40.66% of records; inclusion of date of birth reduced the rates to range from 0.16% to 15.47%. The number of records existing for the most frequently occurring name at each site ranged from 41 to 2552. Institutions varied widely in the methods they implemented for preventing, detecting and removing duplicate records, and mitigating resulting errors. Conclusions The percentage of records having matching patient identifiers is high in several organisations, indicating that the rate of duplicate records or records may also be high. Further efforts are necessary to improve management of duplicate records or records with matching identifiers and minimise the risk for patient harm.

[1]  Molly McClellan.  Duplicate Medical Records: A Survey of Twin Cities Healthcare Organizations , 2009, AMIA.

[2]  Scott L. DuVall,et al.  Extending the Fellegi-Sunter probabilistic record linkage method for approximate field comparators , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Donald L Fisher,et al.  Providers do not verify patient identity during computer order entry. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  S A Waien,et al.  Linking large administrative databases: a method for conducting emergency medical services cohort studies using existing data. , 1997, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Toward a Statewide Health Information Technology Center (Abbreviated Version) , 2010, Southern medical journal.

[7]  Expected Number of Random Duplications Within or Between Lists , 2010 .

[8]  William H. Edwards,et al.  Patient Misidentification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Quantification of Risk , 2006, Pediatrics.

[9]  Scott L. DuVall,et al.  The Impact of a Growing Minority Population on Identification of Duplicate Records in an Enterprise Data Warehouse , 2010, MedInfo.

[10]  C. Navarro,et al.  DataLink Record Linkage Software Applied to the Cancer Registry of Murcia, Spain , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Analysis of a Probabilistic Record Linkage Technique without Human Review , 2003, AMIA.

[12]  Kathleen O'neill,et al.  Patient misidentification in a pediatric emergency department: patient safety and legal perspectives. , 2004, Pediatric emergency care.

[13]  Perry L. Miller,et al.  Exploring the Utility of Demographic Data and Vaccination History Data in the Deduplication of Immunization Registry Patient Records , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Scott L. DuVall,et al.  Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population Database , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  M G Arellano,et al.  Issues in identification and linkage of patient records across an integrated delivery system. , 1998, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[16]  C. Ranger,et al.  Making sure the right patient gets the right care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[17]  Elmer V. Bernstam,et al.  Duplicate Patient Records - Implication for Missed Laboratory Results , 2012, AMIA.

[18]  Philip Achimugu,et al.  Record Linkage System in a Complex Relational Database - MINPHIS Example , 2010, MedInfo.

[19]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Legal, Ethical, and Financial Dilemmas in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Use , 2011, Pediatrics.

[20]  C Friedman,et al.  Validating patient names in an integrated clinical information system. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[21]  James J. Lu,et al.  FRIL: A Tool for Comparative Record Linkage , 2008, AMIA.

[22]  Farah Magrabi,et al.  Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  J. Westfall,et al.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits. , 2005, JAMA.

[24]  L. Schulmeister,et al.  Patient misidentification in oncology care. , 2008, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[25]  Sidney N. Thornton,et al.  Reducing Duplicate Patient Creation Using a Probabilistic Matching Algorithm in an Open-access Community Data Sharing Environment , 2005, AMIA.

[26]  A. Stiell,et al.  Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[27]  P. Charache,et al.  Registration-associated patient misidentification in an academic medical center: causes and corrections. , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[28]  Erik-André Sauleau,et al.  Medical record linkage in health information systems by approximate string matching and clustering , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[29]  Donald L Fisher,et al.  Patient identification errors are common in a simulated setting. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[30]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Real World Performance of Approximate String Comparators for use in Patient Matching , 2004, MedInfo.

[31]  Anselm C W Lee,et al.  Managing patients with identical names in the same ward. , 2005, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.