Removal of painful orthopaedic implants after fracture union.

BACKGROUND Persistent pain in the region of implanted hardware following fracture fixation commonly leads to implant removal. This prospective study evaluated patient outcomes and pain reduction following removal of orthopaedic hardware implanted for fracture fixation. METHODS Sixty patients who had been treated previously for a fracture and complained of pain in the region of the fracture fixation hardware constituted the study cohort. Patients were carefully examined by the treating physician to rule out other causes of pain such as infection and nonunion. Baseline data were recorded preoperatively. Data obtained postoperatively at three, six, and twelve months included a visual analog pain scale score and results on the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. At the one-year interval, a patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS There were no complications associated with implant removal surgery. Three patients did not have complete follow-up, leaving a total of fifty-seven patients with complete follow-up. At one year, all patients indicated that they were satisfied, that they would have the procedure done again, and that their overall function had improved. The scores for pain on the visual analog scale decreased from a mean (and standard deviation) of 5.5 +/- 2.5 before hardware removal to 1.3 +/- 1.8 after hardware removal, with an overall improvement at one year of 76% (p = 0.00001). At one year, thirty (53%) of the fifty-seven patients had complete resolution of pain. In addition, the results on the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire showed a 43% improvement from baseline (p = 0.0001), and the results on the physical component of the Short Form-36 showed a similar improvement of 40% (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Following fracture-healing, removal of hardware is safe with minimal risk. Improvement in pain relief and function can be expected.

[1]  I. Rutkow Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  C. Ackroyd,et al.  Removal of forearm plates. A review of the complications. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  B. Morrey Post-traumatic contracture of the elbow. Operative treatment, including distraction arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  P. Sanderson,et al.  Complications of metalwork removal. , 1992, Injury.

[5]  J. Palmer,et al.  Observations on removal of metal implants. , 1992, Injury.

[6]  C. Jensen,et al.  Removal of Internal Fixation—The Effect on Patients’ Complaints: A Study of 66 Cases of Removal of Internal Fixation after Malleolar Fractures , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Refracture risk after plate removal in the forearm. , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  O. Böstman,et al.  Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  R. Dodenhoff,et al.  Proximal thigh pain after femoral nailing. Causes and treatment. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  J. Keating,et al.  Knee pain after tibial nailing. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  Scott T. Smith,et al.  Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  J. Murphy,et al.  Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified. , 1999, Injury.

[14]  André Miran,et al.  Complications and re-operation rate after tension-band wiring of olecranon fractures , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[15]  W. Obremskey,et al.  Incidence of Hardware-Related Pain and Its Effect on Functional Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[16]  C. Krettek,et al.  Femoral Nail Removal Should Be Restricted in Asymptomatic Patients , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  W. Obremskey,et al.  Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.