Estimation of entanglement in bipartite systems directly from tomograms

We investigate the advantages of extracting the degree of entanglement in bipartite systems directly from tomograms, as it is the latter that are readily obtained from experiments. This would provide a superior alternative to the standard procedure of assessing the extent of entanglement between subsystems after employing the machinery of state reconstruction from the tomogram. The latter is both cumbersome and involves statistical methods, while a direct inference about entanglement from the tomogram circumvents these limitations. In an earlier paper, we had identified a procedure to obtain a bipartite entanglement indicator directly from tomograms. To assess the efficacy of this indicator, we now carry out a detailed investigation using two nonlinear bipartite models by comparing this tomographic indicator with standard markers of entanglement such as the subsystem linear entropy and the subsystem von Neumann entropy and also with a commonly used indicator obtained from inverse participation ratios. The two-model systems selected for this purpose are a multilevel atom interacting with a radiation field, and a double-well Bose–Einstein condensate. The role played by the specific initial states of these two systems in the performance of the tomographic indicator is also examined. Further, the efficiency of the tomographic entanglement indicator during the dynamical evolution of the system is assessed from a time-series analysis of the difference between this indicator and the subsystem von Neumann entropy.

[1]  W. Beugeling,et al.  Global characteristics of all eigenstates of local many-body Hamiltonians: participation ratio and entanglement entropy , 2014, 1410.7702.

[2]  Adam Miranowicz,et al.  Priority Choice Experimental Two-Qubit Tomography: Measuring One by One All Elements of Density Matrices , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  M. Rohith,et al.  Signatures of entanglement in an optical tomogram , 2015, 1505.02698.

[4]  Generation of generalized coherent states with two coupled Bose-Einstein condensates , 2005, quant-ph/0507050.

[5]  Beck,et al.  Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[6]  Mehmet Emre Çek,et al.  Analysis of observed chaotic data , 2004 .

[7]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[8]  M. Rohith,et al.  Visualizing revivals and fractional revivals in a Kerr medium using an optical tomogram , 2015, 1507.03724.

[9]  Robin Blume-Kohout,et al.  Entanglement verification with finite data. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[10]  L. Viola,et al.  Generalized entanglement as a framework for complex quantum systems: purity versus delocalization measures , 2007, quant-ph/0702014.

[11]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[12]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Local Lyapunov exponents computed from observed data , 1992 .

[13]  A. Lakshminarayan,et al.  Entanglement and localization transitions in eigenstates of interacting chaotic systems. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[14]  B. Sudarsan,et al.  Entanglement Dynamics in a Model Tripartite Quantum System , 2015, 1509.06952.

[15]  Holger Kantz,et al.  Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. , 1998, Chaos.

[16]  Entropy of entanglement and multifractal exponents for random states , 2008, 0807.3716.

[17]  B. Sharmila,et al.  Signatures of nonclassical effects in optical tomograms , 2016, 1607.07210.

[18]  A. I. Lvovsky,et al.  Iterative maximum-likelihood reconstruction in quantum homodyne tomography , 2003, quant-ph/0311097.

[19]  N. Bar-Gill,et al.  Atomic homodyne detection of continuous-variable entangled twin-atom states , 2011, Nature.

[20]  P. Kevrekidis,et al.  Correlation effects in the quench-induced phase separation dynamics of a two species ultracold quantum gas , 2017, 1712.03537.

[21]  A. Sergienko,et al.  Direct Measurement of Nonlinear Properties of Bipartite Quantum States , 2005, Open systems & information dynamics.

[22]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Characterization of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[23]  B. Georgeot,et al.  Entanglement of localized states , 2007, 0704.2765.

[24]  A. Ibort,et al.  An introduction to the tomographic picture of quantum mechanics , 2009, 0904.4439.

[25]  S. Weigert,et al.  Mutually unbiased bases for continuous variables , 2008, 0802.0394.

[26]  T. Yu,et al.  Sudden Death of Entanglement , 2009, Science.

[27]  S. Lakshmibala,et al.  Manifestations of wave packet revivals in the moments of observables , 2004 .

[28]  S. Olivares,et al.  TOWARD A FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF DENSITY MATRIX BY ON/OFF MEASUREMENTS , 2009 .

[29]  Paweł Horodecki,et al.  Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[30]  Entanglement, avoided crossings, and quantum chaos in an Ising model with a tilted magnetic field , 2006, quant-ph/0611248.

[31]  Vogel,et al.  Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[32]  P. Horodecki,et al.  Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[33]  V. Balakrishnan,et al.  Estimation of nonclassical properties of multiphoton coherent states from optical tomograms , 2017, 1705.08190.

[34]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[35]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[36]  Jiangwei Shang,et al.  Optimal error intervals for properties of the quantum state , 2016, 1602.05780.

[37]  A. Lvovsky,et al.  Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography , 2009 .

[38]  Agarwal,et al.  Collapse and revival phenomenon in the evolution of a resonant field in a Kerr-like medium. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[39]  Dirk-Gunnar Welsch,et al.  Density-matrix reconstruction by unbalanced homodyning , 1997 .

[40]  L. F. Santos,et al.  Interplay between interaction and (un)correlated disorder in one-dimensional many-particle systems: delocalization and global entanglement , 2008, 0810.4560.

[41]  David J. Starling,et al.  Quantum chaos, delocalization, and entanglement in disordered Heisenberg models. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  Andrea De Luca,et al.  Structure of typical states of a disordered Richardson model and many-body localization , 2011 .