Magnetic resonance imaging gradient coil design by combining optimization techniques with the finite element method

In this paper, the optimization techniques of complex method, steepest descent, and conjugate gradient are investigated in terms of their convergence behaviors. The conjugate gradient method is then combined with finite element analysis techniques to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) G/sub z/ gradient coil design strategy which maximizes the field linearity within a specified region of interest. It is found that conjugate gradient optimization in conjunction with the finite element method is a powerful and flexible coil design approach with the potential to incorporate complex coil geometries, inhomogeneous media, and transient current excitation.

[1]  J. Martín,et al.  Improved sensitivity of MRI in multiple sclerosis by use of extensive standardized procedures. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  H. S. Cabayan,et al.  Efficient Techniques for Finite Element Analysis of Electric Machines , 1973 .

[3]  W. F. Velloso,et al.  A coil system for VIRGO providing a uniform magnetic field gradient , 1992 .

[4]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Design of shielded quadrupolar gradient coils for magnetic resonance microscopy by simulated annealing , 1994 .

[5]  G. F. Uler,et al.  Design optimization of electrical machines using genetic algorithms , 1995 .

[6]  K. Yoda,et al.  Analytical design method of self‐shielded planar coils , 1990 .

[7]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[8]  Osama A. Mohammed,et al.  Utilizing genetic algorithms for the optimal design of electromagnetic devices , 1994 .

[9]  R Turner,et al.  Real‐time movie imaging from a single cardiac cycle by NMR , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  M. Repetto,et al.  A combined strategy for optimization in nonlinear magnetic problems using simulated annealing and search techniques , 1992 .

[11]  J. Hyde,et al.  Coil optimization for MRI by conjugate gradient descent , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  C. Sotak,et al.  A new design for a three‐channel surface gradient coil employing a three‐dimensional finite element model , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R. Turner.  A Target Field Approach To Optimal Coil Design , 1986 .

[14]  V. C. Srivastava,et al.  An inverse approach to the design of MRI main magnets , 1994 .

[15]  Kazimierz Adamiak,et al.  Optimizing strategy for MR imaging gradient coils , 1994 .

[16]  C. B. Rajanathan,et al.  A method of approach to transient eddy current problems coupled with voltage sources , 1996 .

[17]  C-N. Chen,et al.  Biomedical magnetic resonance technology , 1989 .

[18]  P. Di Barba,et al.  3D global optimum of an electromechanical device , 1994 .

[19]  R. Turner,et al.  Gradient coil design: a review of methods. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  N. Narayana Rao,et al.  Elements of engineering electromagnetics , 1977 .

[21]  R. Ludwig,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional numerical analysis of gradient and parasitic gradient fields of a three-channel surface gradient coil for magnetic resonance imaging , 1996 .

[22]  J. Kong.  Electromagnetic Wave Theory , 1986 .

[23]  E. M. Freeman,et al.  Shape optimization of electromagnetic devices including eddy-currents , 1995 .

[24]  S. Pissanetzky.  Minimum energy MRI gradient coils of general geometry , 1992 .