Examining motion in the cervical spine. II: Characterization of coupled joint motion using an opto-electronic device to track skin markers.

Analysis of coupled motion in the cervical spine may be useful in helping to identify injuries. In order to investigate this possibility, the nature of coupled motion in the spine and previous investigations on this subject are reviewed here. An enhanced set of displays are developed for an existing opto-electronic device employed for the non-invasive measurement of movement in the upper spine. This instrument consists of a high resolution motion analysis system which tracks small infrared emitting diodes (IREDs). Kinematic data for the motion of the markers is processed and absolute coordinates for the location of each IRED at any time are tabulated; coupled motion with respect to a fixed calibration frame, as well as for vertebrae relative to each other, is deduced from these. Overall analysis provided by the original device includes assessment of cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and inter-segmental mobility. Characterization of coupled motion, in particular, involves a series of plots showing principal versus secondary motion. Principal movements include flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, corresponding to motion in the sagittal, transverse, and horizontal planes, respectively. Mobility is represented in terms of the direction angles made by virtual vectors orthogonal to the planes made by markers on the head, neck, and shoulders. Development of the enhanced displays and the required refinements are described. Precision of the deduced angles is found to be approximately 1 degree. This representation of coupled motion is expected to be valuable in improving the accuracy of attempts to identify normal versus pathological motion in the cervical spine.

[1]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Upper Cervical Spine , 1988, Spine.

[2]  M. Hohl NORMAL MOTIONS IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Cervical Spine: Flexion/Extension , 1988, Spine.

[4]  M H Pope,et al.  The mechanical and kinematic analysis of the lumbar spine in normal living human subjects in vivo. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  T. Tamaki,et al.  Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine with Special Reference to the Axial Rotation , 1989, Spine.

[6]  E. Lysell Motion in the cervical spine. An experimental study on autopsy specimens. , 1969, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Three-Dimensional X-ray Analysis of Normal Movement in the Lumbar Spine , 1984, Spine.

[8]  Panjabi Mm Experimental determination of spinal motion segment behavior. , 1977 .

[9]  M Panjabi,et al.  A mathematical approach for three-dimensional analysis of the mechanics of the spine. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  L Penning,et al.  Differences in anatomy, motion, development and aging of the upper and lower cervical disk segments. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  A. Schultz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Human Spine and Trunk , 1988, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[12]  A. Sances,et al.  The biomechanics of spinal injuries. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  R Zehnder,et al.  CT - Functional Diagnostics of the Rotatory Instability of the Upper Cervical Spine: Part 2. An Evaluation on Healthy Adults and Patients with Suspected Instability , 1987, Spine.

[14]  L Penning,et al.  Rotation of the Cervical Spine: A CT Study in Normal Subjects , 1987, Spine.

[15]  C. L. Nash,et al.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. , 1984, Spine.

[17]  A. Schultz,et al.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  S Gracovetsky,et al.  The Optimum Spine , 1986, Spine.

[19]  I. Stokes,et al.  Critique of the optimum spine. , 1987, Spine.

[20]  A Plamondon,et al.  Evaluation of Euler's angles with a least squares method for the study of lumbar spine motion. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[21]  C H Suh,et al.  The fundamentals of computer aided X-ray analysis of the spine. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three‐dimensional load‐displacement curves due to froces on the cervical spine , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.