Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND Although the relation between hospital volume and surgical mortality is well established, for most procedures, the relative importance of the experience of the operating surgeon is uncertain. METHODS Using information from the national Medicare claims data base for 1998 through 1999, we examined mortality among all 474,108 patients who underwent one of eight cardiovascular procedures or cancer resections. Using nested regression models, we examined the relations between operative mortality and surgeon volume and hospital volume (each in terms of total procedures performed per year), with adjustment for characteristics of the patients and other characteristics of the providers. RESULTS Surgeon volume was inversely related to operative mortality for all eight procedures (P=0.003 for lung resection, P<0.001 for all other procedures). The adjusted odds ratio for operative death (for patients with a low-volume surgeon vs. those with a high-volume surgeon) varied widely according to the procedure--from 1.24 for lung resection to 3.61 for pancreatic resection. Surgeon volume accounted for a large proportion of the apparent effect of the hospital volume, to an extent that varied according to the procedure: it accounted for 100 percent of the effect for aortic-valve replacement, 57 percent for elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, 55 percent for pancreatic resection, 49 percent for coronary-artery bypass grafting, 46 percent for esophagectomy, 39 percent for cystectomy, and 24 percent for lung resection. For most procedures, the mortality rate was higher among patients of low-volume surgeons than among those of high-volume surgeons, regardless of the surgical volume of the hospital in which they practiced. CONCLUSIONS For many procedures, the observed associations between hospital volume and operative mortality are largely mediated by surgeon volume. Patients can often improve their chances of survival substantially, even at high-volume hospitals, by selecting surgeons who perform the operations frequently.

[1]  C. Begg,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Is surgery getting safer? National trends in operative mortality. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  E. Hannan,et al.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. , 2002, Surgery.

[7]  E. Halm,et al.  Association of Surgical Specialty and Processes of Care With Patient Outcomes for Carotid Endarterectomy , 2001, Stroke.

[8]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Operative mortality with elective surgery in older adults. , 2001, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[9]  B. Hillner,et al.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[11]  Ian H. Langford,et al.  A User’s Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.10 , 2000 .

[12]  M. Choti,et al.  Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[13]  D. Whellan,et al.  Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Begg,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. , 1998, JAMA.

[15]  E. Hannan,et al.  Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. , 1998, Stroke.

[16]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[17]  The impact of practicing in multiple hospitals on physician profiles. , 1996, Medical care.

[18]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.

[19]  N. Breslow,et al.  Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models , 1993 .

[20]  E. Fisher,et al.  Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? , 1992, JAMA.

[21]  E. Fisher,et al.  The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[22]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.