Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria, Australia

Detailed and reliable information about the spatial distribution of species provides critical information for effective conservation planning. In Victoria, Australia, this responsibility is held by the Department of Sustainability and Environment, which maintains and curates a database of site records for species: the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas. But the information is provided in point form, and therefore, it does not provide an adequate view of species distributions for all management purposes. By integrating known occurrences of species with environmental GIS data layers using a machine learning algorithm, random forest, we have built species distribution models for 523 vertebrate fauna species across the whole state, providing predictive ‘maps’ that are available for use in various conservation planning activities. In this paper, we introduce and discuss the methods we developed and implemented for producing these models. Specifically, 26 explanatory variables were used for the modelling; three versions of models were built using different sets of explanatory variables; pseudo-absences were chosen by filtering random points with a profile model; model accuracy was assessed using several measures, especially lift curve-related ones; a threshold was selected for each model to transform continuous result to binary one by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and (pseudo) specificity, which was proved to be valid for presence-only data.

[1]  Catherine S. Jarnevich,et al.  Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[3]  Tim Newbold,et al.  Climate‐based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna , 2009 .

[4]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[5]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction , 2010 .

[6]  R. Pearson,et al.  Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar , 2006 .

[7]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[9]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[10]  R. Kadmon,et al.  EFFECT OF ROADSIDE BIAS ON THE ACCURACY OF PREDICTIVE MAPS PRODUCED BY BIOCLIMATIC MODELS , 2004 .

[11]  Tim Newbold,et al.  Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models , 2010 .

[12]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[13]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[14]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[15]  G. Newell,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models more thoroughly , 2009 .

[16]  M. White,et al.  Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data , 2011 .

[17]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[18]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants , 2009 .

[19]  J. Blackard,et al.  Journal of Applied , 2006 .

[20]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling , 2008 .

[21]  H. Pulliam.  On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[22]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  G. Juday,et al.  Modeling the distribution of white spruce (Picea glauca) for Alaska with high accuracy: an open access role-model for predicting tree species in last remaining wilderness areas , 2009, Polar Biology.

[24]  P. Vesk,et al.  To what are woodland birds responding? Inference on relative importance of in-site habitat variables using several ensemble habitat modelling techniques , 2011 .

[25]  J. Lobo,et al.  Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species , 2008 .