Validation of automatic cochlear implant electrode localization techniques using μCTs

Abstract. Cochlear implants (CIs) are standard treatment for patients who experience sensorineural hearing loss. Although these devices have been remarkably successful at restoring hearing, it is rare that they permit to achieve natural fidelity and many patients experience poor outcomes. Our group has developed image-guided CI programming techniques (IGCIP), in which image analysis techniques are used to locate the intracochlear position of CI electrodes to determine patient-customized settings for the CI processor. Clinical studies have shown that IGCIP leads to significantly improved outcomes. A crucial step is the localization of the electrodes, and rigorously quantifying the accuracy of our algorithms requires dedicated datasets. We discuss the creation of a ground truth dataset for electrode position and its use to evaluate the accuracy of our electrode localization techniques. Our final ground truth dataset includes 30 temporal bone specimens that were each implanted with one of four different types of electrode array by an experienced CI surgeon. The arrays were localized in conventional CT images using our automatic methods and manually in high-resolution μCT images to create the ground truth. The conventional and μCT images were registered to facilitate comparison between automatic and ground truth electrode localization results. Our technique resulted in mean errors of 0.13 mm in localizing the electrodes across 30 cases. Our approach successfully permitted characterizing the accuracy of our methods, which is critical to understand their limitations for use in IGCIP.

[1]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of an Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming Strategy , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in post-implantation CT of unilateral cochlear implant recipients , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic Localization of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in CT , 2014, MICCAI.

[6]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  In Vivo Estimates of the Position of Advanced Bionics Electrode Arrays in the Human Cochlea , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[7]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Validation of cochlear implant electrode localization techniques , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[8]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CTs with a limited intensity range , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[12]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[15]  Thomas Klenzner,et al.  Quality Control after Cochlear Implant Surgery by Means of Rotational Tomography , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Automatic selection of the active electrode set for image-guided cochlear implant programming , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[17]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Assessment of Electrode Placement and Audiological Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implantation , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[18]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Flux driven automatic centerline extraction , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014 , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[20]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Intracochlear Anatomy in Conventional CT , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Initial Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming in Children , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  An artifact-robust, shape library-based algorithm for automatic segmentation of inner ear anatomy in post-cochlear-implantation CT , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[23]  Edwin Bennink,et al.  Automatic Localization of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in CT , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[24]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic Graph-Based Localization of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in CT , 2015, MICCAI.

[25]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Image-Guidance Enables New Methods for Customizing Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Thomas Demarcy Segmentation and study of anatomical variability of the cochlea from medical images , 2017 .

[27]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  A multiscale imaging and modelling dataset of the human inner ear , 2017, Scientific Data.