Improvement suggestions for the DSRM model Full Paper

This study addresses the process of Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM). The study’s proposal is that the DSRM process can be revised by relevant elements, such as user experience, co-creativity, and trust building. The research revealed that user-centered aspects and user-computer interactions are important for the success of the design and realization of information systems, and thus are necessary to take into account in the DSRM process model. The main findings of the study are that it is imperative to integrate the users’ experience and design research, trust building, and co-creativity aspects into the DSRM process as early as possible. It is also vital to train users to use the system so that the system’s design-development-dissemination continuums can be as effective as possible. The outcome of this study addresses the DSRM process and its modularity, usefulness, and feasibility in the field of information systems design theory.

[1]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[2]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[3]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[4]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[5]  Jyri Rajamaki.  Studies of satellite-based tracking systems for improving law enforcement : comprising investigation data, digital evidence and monitoring of legality , 2014 .

[6]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Satu Luojus,et al.  From a momentary experience to a lasting one : the concept of and research on expanded user experience of mobile devices , 2010 .

[8]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Extending Critical Success Factors Methodology to Facilitate Broadly Participative Information Systems Planning , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ping Zhang,et al.  IT Artifacts and The State of IS Research , 2011, ICIS.

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Adenekan Dedeke.  Improving Legacy-System Sustainability: A Systematic Approach , 2012, IT Professional.

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Lessons learned from modeling the dynamics of software development , 1989, CACM.

[18]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Steven L. Alter.  Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[22]  Rauno Pirenen,et al.  Research Framework of Integrative Action , 2009, AMCIS.

[23]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A Theory of Theories in Information Systems , 2002 .

[24]  Rauno Pirinen,et al.  Towards Continuum-focused Methodology for Information Systems Research and development , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[25]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  Sherry D. Ryan,et al.  Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in Information Technology Investment Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[30]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Toward a broader vision for Information Systems , 2011, TMIS.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..