Use of forward sensitivity analysis method to improve code scaling, applicability, and uncertainty (CSAU) methodology

Abstract Since the code scaling, applicability, and uncertainty (CSAU) methodology was proposed about two decades ago, it has been widely used for new reactor designs and existing LWRs power uprates. In spite of these huge successes, CSAU has been criticized for the need of further improvement, focusing on two main issues – lack of objectiveness and high cost. With the effort to develop next generation safety analysis codes, new opportunities appear to take advantage of new numerical methods, better physical models, and modern uncertainty qualification methods. Forward sensitivity (FS) analysis directly solves the partial differential equations for parameter sensitivities. Moreover, our work shows that time and space steps can be treated as special sensitivity parameters so that numerical errors can be directly compared with physical uncertainties. It should be noted that FS analysis is an intrusive uncertainty quantification method that requires the user of the method to be familiar with the simulation code structure including numerical spatial and temporal integration techniques. When the FS analysis is implemented in a new advanced system analysis code, CSAU could be significantly improved by quantifying numerical errors and allowing a quantitative PIRT (Q-PIRT) to reduce subjective judgment and improve efficiency. This paper will review the issues related to the current CSAU implementations, introduce FS analysis, show a simple example to perform FS analysis, and discuss potential improvements on CSAU with FS analysis. Finally, the general research direction and requirements to use FS analysis in an advanced system analysis code will be discussed.

[1]  P. Roache Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions , 2002 .

[2]  A. Prošek,et al.  The State-of-the-Art Theory and Applications of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty Methods , 2007 .

[3]  Cesare Frepoli,et al.  Comparison of Realistic Large Break LOCA Analyses of a 3-Loop Westinghouse Plant Using Response Surface and Statistical Sampling Techniques , 2004 .

[4]  N. Zuber,et al.  The effects of complexity, of simplicity and of scaling in thermal-hydraulics , 2001 .

[5]  Vincent A. Mousseau,et al.  Accurate Solution of the Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations from Thermal Hydraulics: Thermal Hydraulics , 2007 .

[6]  Steven L. Lee,et al.  Analyzing radiation diffusion using time-dependent sensitivity-based techniques , 2003 .

[7]  G. E. Wilson,et al.  The role of the PIRT process in experiments, code development and code applications associated with Reactor Safety analysis , 1998 .

[8]  Jean C. Ragusa,et al.  Coupling Schemes for Multiphysics Reactor Simulation , 2007 .

[9]  Michael B. Tocci,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of large-scale time dependent PDEs ? ? This research is supported by the Univer , 2001 .

[10]  Carol S. Woodward,et al.  Enabling New Flexibility in the SUNDIALS Suite of Nonlinear and Differential/Algebraic Equation Solvers , 2020, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[11]  B. E. Boyack,et al.  Quantifying reactor safety margins part 3: Assessment and ranging of parameters , 1990 .

[12]  Dan G. Cacuci,et al.  Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the RELAP5/MOD3.2 Two-Fluid Thermal-Hydraulic Code System—I: Theory , 2000 .

[13]  Dan G. Cacuci,et al.  Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the RELAP5/MOD3.2 Two-Fluid Thermal-Hydraulic Code System—II: Applications , 2000 .

[14]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Patrick Knupp,et al.  Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions , 2000 .

[16]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Regular Article: A Semi-implicit Numerical Scheme for Reacting Flow , 1999 .

[17]  D. Keyes,et al.  Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications , 2004 .

[18]  Kevin J. Dowding,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Heat Conduction , 2001 .

[19]  R. P. Martin,et al.  AREVA's realistic large break LOCA analysis methodology , 2005 .

[20]  Lawrence E. Hochreiter,et al.  Application of code scaling applicability and uncertainty methodology to the large break loss of coolant , 1998 .

[21]  B. E. Boyack,et al.  TPG response to the foregoing letters-to-the-editor , 1992 .

[22]  Haihua Zhao,et al.  Extended Forward Sensitivity Analysis for Uncertainty Quantification , 2013 .

[23]  Attila Guba,et al.  Statistical aspects of best estimate method - I , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  S. S. Wilks Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits , 1941 .

[25]  P. S. Wyckoff,et al.  A Semi-implicit Numerical Scheme for Reacting Flow , 1998 .