Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis.

PURPOSE To determine new referents, or cutoff levels for tear film hyperosmolarity in the diagnosis of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) and to assess their effectiveness in independent patient groups. METHOD A meta-analysis was performed on published data for tear osmolarity in samples of normal eyes and various subtypes of dry eye, and pooled estimates of the mean and standard deviations for normal and (all) dry eye subjects were determined. Diagnostic referents were derived from the intercept between the distributions of osmolarity in the two samples and from receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. This referent was tested for effectiveness of diagnosis in independent groups with normal and dry eyes. RESULTS An osmolarity referent of 315.6 mOsmol/L was derived from the intercept of the distribution curves, and 316 mOsmol/L from the ROC curve. When applied to independent groups of normal and dry eye subjects a value of 316 mOsmol/L was found to yield sensitivity of 59%, specificity of 94%, and an overall predictive accuracy of 89% for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Tear hyperosmolarity, defined by a referent of 316 mOsmol/L, was superior in overall accuracy to any other single test for dry eye diagnosis (Lactoplate, Schirmer test, and Rose Bengal staining), even when the other test measures were applied to a diagnosis within the sample groups from which they were derived. For overall accuracy in the diagnosis of dry eye, the osmolarity test was found to be comparable with the results of combined (in parallel or series) tests.

[1]  I. Mandel,et al.  Basal and reflex human tear analysis. II. Chemical analysis: lactoferrin and lysozyme. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  K. Kenyon,et al.  Tear film osmolarity and ocular surface disease in two rabbit models for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Paul Mitchell,et al.  Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  W. Mathers,et al.  Why the eye becomes dry: a cornea and lacrimal gland feedback model. , 2000, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[6]  J. Wright,et al.  Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  B. Munoz,et al.  Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  I. Mandel,et al.  Diagnostic tests in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1983, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[9]  M. Iester,et al.  Improvement of the ocular surface using hypotonic 0.4% hyaluronic acid drops in keratoconjunctivitis sicca , 2000, Eye.

[10]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[11]  R. Farris,et al.  Tear osmolarity--a new gold standard? , 1994, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[12]  R. Farris,et al.  A comparison of diagnostic tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca: lactoplate, Schirmer, and tear osmolarity. , 1990, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[13]  S. Wassertheil-Smoller,et al.  Biostatistics and Epidemiology , 1990, Springer New York.

[14]  W. Lee,et al.  Morphological changes in the human conjunctival epithelium. II. In keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1978, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Y. Karakoç,et al.  Comparison of tear-film osmolarity in different types of contact lenses. , 2002, The CLAO Journal.

[16]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Assessment of tear film dynamics: quantification approach. , 2005, The ocular surface.

[17]  H. Dua,et al.  Impression cytology of the ocular surface , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Effect of Age on Tear Osmolality , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  S. L. Lempert,et al.  Chalazia and rosacea. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Greenwood An Introduction to Medical Statistics , 1932, Nature.

[21]  I. Karube,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tear fluid in healthy persons and keratoconjunctivitis sicca patients measured by a flexible conductimetric sensor , 1996, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[22]  J. P. Gilbard,et al.  A new rabbit model for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  R. Farris,et al.  Osmolarity of tear microvolumes in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  R. Hill,et al.  Human tears: osmotic characteristics. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  J. Nelson,et al.  Tear film osmolality determination: an evaluation of potential errors in measurement. , 1986, Current eye research.

[26]  M. Lemp Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. , 1995, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[27]  D. Dartt,et al.  Changes in rabbit lacrimal gland fluid osmolarity with flow rate. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  D. Azar,et al.  Effect of punctal occlusion by Freeman silicone plug insertion on tear osmolarity in dry eye disorders. , 1989, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[29]  J. P. Gilbard Tear film osmolarity and keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1985, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[30]  P. Maudgal The epithelial response in keratitis sicca and keratitis herpetica (an experimental and clinical study) , 1978, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[31]  O. P. van Bijsterveld Diagnostic tests in the Sicca syndrome. , 1969, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  B. Everitt,et al.  The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics in the Medical Sciences , 1995 .

[33]  M. Refojo,et al.  Morphologic effect of hyperosmolarity on rabbit corneal epithelium. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[34]  I D Mandel,et al.  Basal and reflex human tear analysis. I. Physical measurements: osmolarity, basal volumes, and reflex flow rate. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[35]  R. Hill,et al.  Human basic tear fluid osmolality , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[36]  I. Beitch The induction of keratinization in the corneal epithelium. A comparison of the "dry" and vitamin A-deficient eyes. , 1970, Investigative ophthalmology.

[37]  M B Goren,et al.  Diagnostic tests in patients with symptoms of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1988, American journal of ophthalmology.

[38]  D. Lamberts,et al.  The preocular tear film : in health, disease, and contact lens wear , 1986 .

[39]  O. P. Bijsterveld,et al.  Diagnostic Tests in the Sicca Syndrome , 1969 .

[40]  R. Hill,et al.  Tear osmotic differences across the ocular surface , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[41]  Gilbard Jp Tear film osmolarity and keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1985 .

[42]  J André Knottnerus,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  R. Farris,et al.  Tear osmolarity and ocular surface disease in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[44]  I. Mandel,et al.  Tear osmolarity variation in the dry eye. , 1986, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[45]  P. Mazur,et al.  Osmotic tolerance of human granulocytes. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[46]  J. P. Gilbard,et al.  Tear film and ocular surface changes after closure of the meibomian gland orifices in the rabbit. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[47]  W. Mathers,et al.  Model for Ocular Tear Film Function , 1996, Cornea.

[48]  J P Gilbard,et al.  Human Tear Film Electrolyte Concentrations in Health and Dry-Eye Disease , 1994, International ophthalmology clinics.