Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments.

It is not known how the flexible protective zone maintained around oneself during locomotion (personal space or PS; see [Gérin-Lajoie M, Richards CL, McFadyen BJ. The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. Motor Control 2005;9:242-69]) is modulated with walking speed, whether both sides of the PS are symmetrical, and whether the circumvention of physical and virtual obstructions elicit the same use of such PS. Personal space was measured in ten adults as they circumvented a cylindrical obstacle that was stationary within their path. Both left and right passes were performed at natural self-selected, slow and fast walking speeds. The same circumvention task was also performed at natural speeds in an immersive virtual environment (VE) replicating the same obstruction scenario. The shape and size of PS were maintained across walking speeds, and a smaller PS was generally observed on the dominant side. The general shape and lateral bias of the PS were preserved in the VE while its size was slightly increased. The systematic behavior across walking speeds and types of environment and the lateral bias suggest that PS is used to control navigation. This study deepens our understanding of normal adaptive walking behavior and has implications for the development of better tools for the assessment and retraining of locomotor capacity in different populations, from people with walking deficits to elite athletes. Since the PS behavior was shown to be robust in the VE used for this study, the virtual reality technology is proposed as a promising platform for the development of such assessment and retraining applications.

[1]  Stanley Coren,et al.  Sensorimotor Performance as a Function of Eye Dominance and Handedness , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  B. Rothbaum,et al.  Virtual reality exposure therapy. , 2010, The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research.

[4]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  C. Richards,et al.  The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. , 2005, Motor control.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[8]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[9]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Responses to a Virtual Reality Grocery Store in Persons with and without Vestibular Dysfunction , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Bradford J McFadyen,et al.  The circumvention of obstacles during walking in different environmental contexts: a comparison between older and younger adults. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[14]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  How We Avoid Collisions With Stationary and Moving Obstacles , 2004 .

[15]  S. Coren The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults , 1993 .

[16]  Lori Ann Vallis,et al.  Locomotor adjustments for circumvention of an obstacle in the travel path , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[18]  S Coren,et al.  Monocular Asymmetries in Visual Latency as a Function of Sighting Dominance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  Francine Malouin,et al.  A Treadmill and Motion Coupled Virtual Reality System for Gait Training Post-Stroke , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003 .