Classification of Osteoporosis Based on Bone Mineral Densities

In this article we examine the role of bone mineral density (BMD) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Using information from 7671 women in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) with BMD measurements at the proximal femur, lumbar spine, forearm, and calcaneus, we examine three models with differing criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Model 1 is based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using a T score of −2.5 relative to the manufacturers' young normative data aged 20‐29 years, with modifications using information from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Model 2 uses a T score of −1 relative to women aged 65 years at the baseline of the SOF population. Model 3 classifies women as osteoporotic if their estimated osteoporotic fracture risk (spine and/or hip) based on age and BMD is above 14.6%. We compare the agreement in osteoporosis classification according to the different BMD measurements for the three models. We also consider whether reporting additional BMD parameters at the femur or forearm improves risk assessment for osteoporotic fractures. We observe that using the WHO criteria with the manufacturers' normative data results in very inconsistent diagnoses. Only 25% of subjects are consistently diagnosed by all of the eight BMD variables. Such inconsistency is reduced by using a common elderly normative population as in model 2, in which case 50% of the subjects are consistently diagnosed as osteoporotic by all of the eight diagnostic methods. Risk‐based diagnostic criteria as in model 3 improve consistency substantially to 68%. Combining the results of BMD assessments at more than one region of interest (ROI) from a single scan significantly increases prediction of hip and/or spine fracture risk and elevates the relative risk with increasing number of low BMD subregions. We conclude that standardization of normative data, perhaps referenced to an older population, may be necessary when applying T scores as diagnostic criteria in patient management. A risk‐based osteoporosis classification does not depend on the manufacturers' reference data and may be more consistent and efficient for patient diagnosis.

[1]  S. Cummings,et al.  Age‐related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65 , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  S. Cummings,et al.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  P. Ross,et al.  Evidence for both generalized and regional low bone mass among elderly women , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. , 1994, World Health Organization technical report series.

[5]  S. Cummings,et al.  Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Robert Epstein,et al.  Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: The study of osteoporotic fractures , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  C C Glüer,et al.  Comparisons of Noninvasive Bone Mineral Measurements in Assessing Age‐Related Loss, Fracture Discrimination, and Diagnostic Classification , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  J. Hanson Standardization of Femur BMD , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  C. Langton,et al.  Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population pre-screen. , 1997, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[11]  H. Genant,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis: Guidelines for the Utilization of Bone Densitometry , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[12]  E. Siris,et al.  The challenges of peripheral bone density testing: which patients need additional central density skeletal measurements? , 1998, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[13]  S. Cummings,et al.  Osteoporosis: Review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Status report , 1998 .

[14]  H. Wahner,et al.  Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  P. Miller,et al.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[16]  H K Genant,et al.  Defining Incident Vertebral Deformity: A Prospective Comparison of Several Approaches , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  J. Kanis,et al.  An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with Densitometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  C C Glüer,et al.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. , 2000, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[19]  J Windeler,et al.  Prognosis - what does the clinician associate with this notion? , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  P. Miller Controversies in Bone Mineral Density Diagnostic Classifications , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.