Diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma: the yield of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.

Three tests are commonly used to diagnose prostate carcinoma to date: serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography. We evaluated these 3 tests in 1,001, 6-sector prostate needle biopsies to rule out prostate carcinoma. Of the biopsies 253 (25.3%) revealed prostate cancer. As a single test, PSA was superior to digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography in predicting cancer in this patient population using difference of proportions tests. Receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed PSA to be the superior test. The combinations of PSA plus transrectal ultrasonography and PSA plus digital rectal examination were superior to digital rectal examination plus transrectal ultrasonography. We found cancer in 35 of 188 patients (18.6%) with intermediate PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. and normal or asymmetric nonindurated rectal examinations. Only 5 of 79 patients (6.3%) with a normal digital rectal examination and PSA level of less than 4.0 ng./ml. demonstrated carcinoma on biopsy. Of the 5 patients 4 had annual increases in PSA of 40% or greater. While hypoechoic sectors were more than twice as likely as isoechoic sectors of the prostate to contain malignancy on biopsy, nearly 37.6% of the cancers were found in isoechoic sectors. A strategy of performing biopsy of only hypoechoic sectors would have misdiagnosed 24.6% of the patients with prostate cancer. We conclude that serum PSA is the most accurate of the 3 diagnostic tests evaluated. We also recommend a systematic sextant biopsy technique.

[1]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Benson,et al.  The use of prostate specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of intermediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Torp-Pedersen,et al.  Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen. , 1989, Radiology.

[4]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J C Eggleston,et al.  Prostatic evaluation by transrectal sonography with histopathologic correlation: the echopenic appearance of early carcinoma. , 1986, Radiology.

[6]  W. Cooner,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[7]  R. Vessella,et al.  Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[8]  G. Murphy,et al.  Prostatic evaluation by transrectal sonography: criteria for diagnosis of early carcinoma. , 1986, Radiology.

[9]  R. Vessella,et al.  Evaluation of the Abbott IMx automated immunoassay of prostate-specific antigen. , 1992, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  H. Huland,et al.  Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluation. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[12]  P. Walsh,et al.  Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[13]  S. Rannikko,et al.  Echogenic structure of prostatic cancer imaged on radical prostatectomy specimens , 1987, The Prostate.

[14]  J Drago,et al.  The American cancer society national prostate cancer detection project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men , 1991, Cancer.

[15]  R. Vessella,et al.  Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen: results of the second year. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[16]  S. Torp-Pedersen,et al.  Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Transrectal US and Digital Rectal Examination for Screening , 1988, Radiology.

[17]  D. Chan,et al.  Estimation of prostatic growth using serial prostate-specific antigen measurements in men with and without prostate disease. , 1992, Cancer research.

[18]  W. Ellis,et al.  The inability of prostate specific antigen index to enhance the predictive the value of prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[19]  H. Huland,et al.  Prostate cancer in nonurological patients with normal prostates on digital rectal examination. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[20]  I. Thompson,et al.  Impact of routine screening for adenocarcinoma of the prostate on stage distribution. , 1987, The Journal of urology.

[21]  H. J. Jewett Significance of the palpable prostatic nodule. , 1956, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[22]  M. Brawer,et al.  The diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma , 1993, Cancer.