Comparison of benchtop pressure gradient measurements in 3D printed patient specific cardiac phantoms with CT-FFR and computational fluid dynamic simulations

Purpose: Various CT-FFR methods are being proposed as a non-invasive method to estimate cardiac disease severity. 3D printed patient specific cardiovascular models with high geometric accuracy can be used to simulate blood flow conditions and perform precise and repeatable benchtop flow experiments for validation of such methods. Materials and Methods: Twelve patient-specific 3D printed cardiac phantoms were created from CT Angiography (CTA) scans using a compliant 3D printing material. Pressure sensors were connected to the aortic root and distal ends of the three main coronary arteries to measure benchtop pressure gradients for each stenosed vessel. The patient geometries were used in Canon Medical Systems 1D fluid dynamics algorithm to calculate the CT- FFR. In addition, a 3D computational fluid dynamics simulation was done using ANSYS to estimate pressure gradients across the coronary arteries. Experimental data and 1D and 3D flow simulations were compared to the standard catheter lab FFR measurement (Invasive-FFR). Results: The average percent difference in Benchtop FFR/Invasive FFR, CT-FFR/Invasive FFR, and CFDFFR/Invasive FFR was 0.05, 0.06, and 0.07 respectively. The average time it took for the CT-FFR simulation was ~35 minutes and it took ~15 hours for the CFD-FFR simulation but can vary based on the number of iterations the user defines the software to run. Conclusions: Benchtop FFR proved to be highly accurate when compared to both 1D and 3D CFD software and therefore, 3D printing of patient specific coronary phantoms is a quality tool for CT-FFR software validation.

[1]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Treatment planning for image-guided neuro-vascular interventions using patient-specific 3D printed phantoms , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Initial simulated FFR investigation using flow measurements in patient-specific 3D printed coronary phantoms , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[3]  John F LaDisa,et al.  Alterations in regional vascular geometry produced by theoretical stent implantation influence distributions of wall shear stress: analysis of a curved coronary artery using 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[5]  N. Akbar HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS ON CARREAU FLUID MODEL FOR BLOOD FLOW THROUGH A TAPERED ARTERY WITH A STENOSIS , 2014 .

[6]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[7]  Yoshimi Anzai,et al.  Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios , 2018, 3D Printing in Medicine.

[8]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Advanced 3D mesh manipulation in stereolithographic files and post-print processing for the manufacturing of patient-specific vascular flow phantoms , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.