Assessing Reading Comprehension in Bilinguals

A new measure of reading comprehension, the Diagnostic Assessment of Reading Comprehension (DARC), designed to reflect central comprehension processes while minimizing decoding and language demands, was pilot tested. We conducted three pilot studies to assess the DARC’s feasibility, reliability, comparability across Spanish and English, developmental sensitivity, and relation to standardized measures. The first study, carried out with 16 second‐through sixth‐grade English language learners, showed that the DARC items were at the appropriate reading level. The second pilot study, with 28 native Spanish‐speaking fourth graders who had scored poorly on the Woodcock‐Johnson Language Proficiency Reading Passages subtest, revealed a range of scores on the DARC, that yes‐no answers were valid indicators of respondents’ thinking, and that the Spanish and English versions of the DARC were comparable. The third study, carried out with 521 Spanish‐speaking students in kindergarten through grade 3, confirmed that different comprehension processes assessed by the DARC (text memory, text inferencing, background knowledge, and knowledge integration) could be measured independently, and that DARC scores were less strongly related to word reading than Woodcock‐Johnson comprehension scores. By minimizing the need for high levels of English oral proficiency or decoding ability, the DARC has the potential to reflect the central comprehension processes of second‐language readers of English more effectively than other measures.

[1]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability , 1986 .

[2]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation , 1998 .

[3]  C. Hulme,et al.  Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[4]  M. Daneman,et al.  A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension , 2001 .

[5]  H. Douglas Brown,et al.  Improving Schooling for Language‐Minority Children: A Research Agenda.* , 1998 .

[6]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. , 2000 .

[7]  P. Bryant,et al.  Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection , 1983, Nature.

[8]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Dyslexia: Theory and Research , 1979 .

[9]  S. Pickering,et al.  Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[11]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  Information processing correlates of reading , 1985, Journal of Memory and Language.

[12]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Incorporation versus compartmentalization in memory for discourse , 1985 .

[13]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Processing Components of College-Level Reading Comprehension. , 1994 .

[14]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[15]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  What is reading ability , 1921 .

[16]  G. Freytag.  [CORRELATION AND CAUSALITY]. , 1964, Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie.

[17]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Is "Working Memory Capacity" Just Another Name for Word Knowledge?. , 1990 .

[18]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[19]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Word Knowledge and Working Memory as Predictors of Reading Skill. , 1988 .

[20]  T. Whitlock.  Dyslexia , 1989, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .