CAM Model: Intriguing Natural Bioreactor for Sustainable Research and Reliable/Versatile Testing

Simple Summary The chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is an in ovo model that has been known for years. It has mostly been used to test the characteristics of molecules and cell pellets and their potential interactions with vessels, particularly in cancer studies. Recently, we repurposed such a model by highlighting its ethical features, because, to a large extent, it can reduce the use of animal experimentation and produce rapid results. Its applications have multiplied in recent years, allowing for the development of more in-depth and comprehensive analyses and, thus, reducing the gap between in vitro and in vivo experimentation. Since the CAM model allows for the replacement, reduction, and refinement of preclinical experimentation (rules of the “3Rs”), it makes experimental research more sustainable and in line with animal welfare. The objective of this review is to illustrate the potential of the CAM assay, with a particular focus on the setup of organotypic cultures. This type of assay may be used as a preclinical model to assay recovery strategies for critically-sized bone injuries, i.e., severe fractures that do not spontaneously heal due to disruption of the vascular network and a large gap between the two bone stumps. Abstract We are witnessing the revival of the CAM model, which has already used been in the past by several researchers studying angiogenesis and anti-cancer drugs and now offers a refined model to fill, in the translational meaning, the gap between in vitro and in vivo studies. It can be used for a wide range of purposes, from testing cytotoxicity, pharmacokinetics, tumorigenesis, and invasion to the action mechanisms of molecules and validation of new materials from tissue engineering research. The CAM model is easy to use, with a fast outcome, and makes experimental research more sustainable since it allows us to replace, reduce, and refine pre-clinical experimentation (“3Rs” rules). This review aims to highlight some unique potential that the CAM-assay presents; in particular, the authors intend to use the CAM model in the future to verify, in a microenvironment comparable to in vivo conditions, albeit simplified, the angiogenic ability of functionalized 3D constructs to be used in regenerative medicine strategies in the recovery of skeletal injuries of critical size (CSD) that do not repair spontaneously. For this purpose, organotypic cultures will be planned on several CAMs set up in temporal sequences, and a sort of organ model for assessing CSD will be utilized in the CAM bioreactor rather than in vivo.

[1]  U. Dirksen,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on CAM-Grown Sarcomas , 2023, Bioengineering.

[2]  M. Paul,et al.  Organoid-based 3D in vitro microphysiological systems as alternatives to animal experimentation for preclinical and clinical research , 2023, Archives of Toxicology.

[3]  R. Schneider-Stock,et al.  The Chorioallantoic Membrane Xenograft Assay as a Reliable Model for Investigating the Biology of Breast Cancer , 2023, Cancers.

[4]  U. Ritz,et al.  Oxygen-Releasing Hyaluronic Acid-Based Dispersion with Controlled Oxygen Delivery for Enhanced Periodontal Tissue Engineering , 2023, International journal of molecular sciences.

[5]  Y. Maniwa,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane assay revealed the role of TIPARP (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-inducible poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) in lung adenocarcinoma-induced angiogenesis , 2023, Cancer Cell International.

[6]  R. Schneider-Stock,et al.  Editorial for Special Issue: The Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model—Traditional and State-of-the Art Applications: The 1st International CAM Conference , 2023, Cancers.

[7]  R. Huang,et al.  The CAM Model—Q&A with Experts , 2022, Cancers.

[8]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Rapid fabrication and screening of tailored functional 3D biomaterials: Validation in bone tissue repair - Part II. , 2022, Biomaterials advances.

[9]  A. Herrmann,et al.  The Chick Embryo Xenograft Model for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Cost and Time Efficient 3Rs Model for Drug Target Evaluation , 2022, Cancers.

[10]  M. Messori,et al.  Eco‐Sustainable Approaches in Bone Tissue Engineering: Evaluating the Angiogenic Potential of Different Poly(3‐Hydroxybutyrate‐Co‐3‐Hydroxyhexanoate)–Nanocellulose Composites with the Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay , 2022, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[11]  L. Miebach,et al.  In ovo model in cancer research and tumor immunology , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[12]  Nermeen A. Elkasabgy,et al.  Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications and Current Updates in the Field: A Comprehensive Review , 2022, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[13]  M. Ferretti,et al.  From morphological basic research to proposals for regenerative medicine through a translational perspective , 2022, Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology.

[14]  G. Reilly,et al.  Bioactive Composite for Orbital Floor Repair and Regeneration , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[15]  L. Luptakova,et al.  Evaluation of Angiogenesis in an Acellular Porous Biomaterial Based on Polyhydroxybutyrate and Chitosan Using the Chicken Ex Ovo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model , 2022, Cancers.

[16]  S. Abolmaali,et al.  PEGylated nanohydrogels delivering anti-MicroRNA-21 suppress ovarian tumor-associated angiogenesis in matrigel and chicken chorioallantoic membrane models , 2022, BioImpacts : BI.

[17]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  In vitro and in ovo impact of the ionic dissolution products of boron-doped bioactive silicate glasses on cell viability, osteogenesis and angiogenesis , 2022, Scientific reports.

[18]  L. Smith,et al.  Recreating Tissue Structures Representative of Teratomas In Vitro Using a Combination of 3D Cell Culture Technology and Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2022, Bioengineering.

[19]  E. Sinibaldi,et al.  Design, fabrication, and characterization of a multimodal reconfigurable bioreactor for bone tissue engineering , 2022, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  R. Tuan,et al.  Tendon tissue engineering: Current progress towards an optimized tenogenic differentiation protocol for human stem cells. , 2022, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  N. Dünker,et al.  Retinoblastoma Cell Growth In Vitro and Tumor Formation In Ovo—Influence of Different Culture Conditions , 2022, Methods and protocols.

[22]  K. Pachmann,et al.  Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assays as a Model of Patient-Derived Xenografts from Circulating Cancer Stem Cells (cCSCs) in Breast Cancer Patients , 2022, Cancers.

[23]  Yuanjin Zhao,et al.  Developing tissue engineering strategies for liver regeneration , 2022, Engineered Regeneration.

[24]  Jingming Gao,et al.  Biomaterial-related cell microenvironment in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine , 2022, Engineering.

[25]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine strategies for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations , 2022, Biomaterials and biosystems.

[26]  M. Alonso,et al.  The Different Temozolomide Effects on Tumorigenesis Mechanisms of Pediatric Glioblastoma PBT24 and SF8628 Cell Tumor in CAM Model and on Cells In Vitro , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[27]  D. Ribatti The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as an experimental model to study in vivo angiogenesis in glioblastoma multiforme , 2022, Brain Research Bulletin.

[28]  A. Bogaerts,et al.  Cold Atmospheric Plasma Does Not Affect Stellate Cells Phenotype in Pancreatic Cancer Tissue in Ovo , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[29]  M. Dominici,et al.  A 3D Platform to Investigate Dynamic Cell-to-Cell Interactions Between Tumor Cells and Mesenchymal Progenitors , 2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[30]  U. Dirksen,et al.  5-ALA-mediated fluorescence of musculoskeletal tumors in a chick chorio-allantoic membrane model: preclinical in vivo qualification analysis as a fluorescence-guided surgery agent in Orthopedic Oncology , 2022, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[31]  F. Cholewa,et al.  Vascular implants – new aspects for in situ tissue engineering , 2022, Engineering in life sciences.

[32]  D. Ribatti Two new applications in the study of angiogenesis the CAM assay: Acellular scaffolds and organoids. , 2021, Microvascular research.

[33]  Noah E. Berlow,et al.  Preclinical therapeutics ex ovo quail eggs as a biomimetic automation-ready xenograft platform , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Jens Kurreck,et al.  Animal experiments: EU is pushing to find substitutes fast , 2021, Nature.

[35]  L. Calzà,et al.  A Novel Three-Dimensional Culture Device Favors a Myelinating Morphology of Neural Stem Cell-Derived Oligodendrocytes , 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[36]  V. Adam,et al.  Extending the Applicability of In Ovo and Ex Ovo Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane Assays to Study Cytostatic Activity in Neuroblastoma Cells , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[37]  Jianhua Li,et al.  An in situ tissue engineering scaffold with growth factors combining angiogenesis and osteoimmunomodulatory functions for advanced periodontal bone regeneration , 2021, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[38]  P. Labarre,et al.  In situ Tissue Regeneration in the Cornea from Bench to Bedside , 2021, Cells Tissues Organs.

[39]  B. Nitzsche,et al.  Anticancer Activity and Mechanisms of Action of New Chimeric EGFR/HDAC-Inhibitors , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[40]  S. Gobeil,et al.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1,4-benzodiazepin-3-one derivatives as potential antitumor agents against prostate cancer. , 2021, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[41]  J. Fentem,et al.  Upholding the EU's Commitment to ‘Animal Testing as a Last Resort' Under REACH Requires a Paradigm Shift in How We Assess Chemical Safety to Close the Gap Between Regulatory Testing and Modern Safety Science , 2021, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[42]  A. Mata,et al.  De Novo Design of Functional Coassembling Organic–Inorganic Hydrogels for Hierarchical Mineralization and Neovascularization , 2021, ACS nano.

[43]  K. Hekmat,et al.  Cancer-specific immune evasion and substantial heterogeneity within cancer types provide evidence for personalized immunotherapy , 2021, npj Precision Oncology.

[44]  H. Clevers,et al.  Organoids and organs-on-chips: Insights into human gut-microbe interactions. , 2021, Cell host & microbe.

[45]  S. Kersting,et al.  Murine Macrophages Modulate Their Inflammatory Profile in Response to Gas Plasma-Inactivated Pancreatic Cancer Cells , 2021, Cancers.

[46]  M. Gassmann,et al.  Targeting neovascularization and respiration of tumor grafts grown on chick embryo chorioallantoic membranes , 2021, PloS one.

[47]  B. Fonseca,et al.  The chicken embryo as an in vivo experimental model for drug testing: Advantages and limitations , 2021, Lab Animal.

[48]  Bin Wu,et al.  In situ bone regeneration with sequential delivery of aptamer and BMP2 from an ECM-based scaffold fabricated by cryogenic free-form extrusion , 2021, Bioactive materials.

[49]  B. Arumugam,et al.  MicroRNA-432-5p regulates sprouting and intussusceptive angiogenesis in osteosarcoma microenvironment by targeting PDGFB , 2021, Laboratory Investigation.

[50]  M. Máčajová,et al.  Chorioallantoic Membrane Models of Various Avian Species: Differences and Applications , 2021, Biology.

[51]  R. Huang,et al.  Applications of the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane as an Alternative Model for Cancer Studies , 2021, Cells Tissues Organs.

[52]  M. Piccoli,et al.  A Novel Bioreactor for the Mechanical Stimulation of Clinically Relevant Scaffolds for Muscle Tissue Engineering Purposes , 2021 .

[53]  M. Ferretti,et al.  Static Osteogenesis versus Dynamic Osteogenesis: A Comparison between Two Different Types of Bone Formation , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[54]  Y. Ni,et al.  Utilisation of Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as a Model Platform for Imaging-Navigated Biomedical Research , 2021, Cells.

[55]  C. Garrido,et al.  Nanofitins targeting heat shock protein 110: An innovative immunotherapeutic modality in cancer , 2021, International journal of cancer.

[56]  Liwei Fu,et al.  The Application of Bioreactors for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives , 2021, Stem cells international.

[57]  Xin Cheng,et al.  Reversine suppresses osteosarcoma cell growth through targeting BMP-Smad1/5/8-mediated angiogenesis. , 2021, Microvascular research.

[58]  T. von Woedtke,et al.  Tumor cytotoxicity and immunogenicity of a novel V-jet neon plasma source compared to the kINPen , 2021, Scientific reports.

[59]  G. Blunn,et al.  Pro-angiogenic and osteogenic composite scaffolds of fibrin, alginate and calcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering , 2021, Journal of tissue engineering.

[60]  D. Shu,et al.  Characterization of the exosomes in the allantoic fluid of the chicken embryo , 2020, Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

[61]  Jingdi Chen,et al.  New perspectives: In-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold , 2020, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[62]  Jonas Eckrich,et al.  The Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay in Nanotoxicological Research—An Alternative for In Vivo Experimentation , 2020, Nanomaterials.

[63]  A. Mashaghi,et al.  Organoids and organ chips in ophthalmology. , 2020, The ocular surface.

[64]  J. Kanczler,et al.  Evolving applications of the egg: chorioallantoic membrane assay and ex vivo organotypic culture of materials for bone tissue engineering , 2020, Journal of tissue engineering.

[65]  C. Mummery,et al.  Organs-on-chips: into the next decade , 2020, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[66]  L. Prantl,et al.  Extended analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity of primary osteosarcoma tissue using 3D-in-vivo-tumor-model. , 2020, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.

[67]  Philippe Bédard,et al.  Innovative Human Three-Dimensional Tissue-Engineered Models as an Alternative to Animal Testing , 2020, Bioengineering.

[68]  S. Przyborski,et al.  Bioengineering Novel in vitro Co-culture Models That Represent the Human Intestinal Mucosa With Improved Caco-2 Structure and Barrier Function , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[69]  Jan Baumgart,et al.  Monitoring of tumor growth and vascularization with repetitive ultrasonography in the chicken chorioallantoic-membrane-assay , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[70]  D. Ribatti,et al.  The CAM Assay as an Alternative In Vivo Model for Drug Testing. , 2020, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[71]  S. Fialho,et al.  Successful growth of fresh retinoblastoma cells in chorioallantoic membrane , 2020, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous.

[72]  K. Suhre,et al.  Metabolic Signatures of Tumor Responses to Doxorubicin Elucidated by Metabolic Profiling in Ovo , 2020, Metabolites.

[73]  D. Ribatti,et al.  The use of the chick embryo CAM assay in the study of angiogenic activiy of biomaterials. , 2020, Microvascular research.

[74]  E. García-Gareta,et al.  Towards the Development of a Novel Ex Ovo Model of Infection to Pre-Screen Biomaterials Intended for Treating Chronic Wounds , 2020, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[75]  P. Selvaganapathy,et al.  Tissue-in-a-Tube: three-dimensional in vitro tissue constructs with integrated multimodal environmental stimulation , 2020, Materials today. Bio.

[76]  V. Rasche,et al.  In vivo PET/MRI Imaging of the Chorioallantoic Membrane , 2020, Frontiers in Physics.

[77]  L. White,et al.  Characterisation and evaluation of the regenerative capacity of Stro-4+ enriched bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells using bovine extracellular matrix hydrogel and a novel biocompatible melt electro-written medical-grade polycaprolactone scaffold , 2020, Biomaterials.

[78]  S. Vainio,et al.  Optimization of Renal Organoid and Organotypic Culture for Vascularization, Extended Development, and Improved Microscopy Imaging. , 2020, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[79]  A. Talari,et al.  In-Situ Forming pH and Thermosensitive Injectable Hydrogels to Stimulate Angiogenesis: Potential Candidates for Fast Bone Regeneration Applications , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[80]  C. Heidecke,et al.  Gas Plasma-Conditioned Ringer’s Lactate Enhances the Cytotoxic Activity of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer In Vitro and In Ovo , 2020, Cancers.

[81]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Scleral ossicles: angiogenic scaffolds, a novel biomaterial for regenerative medicine applications. , 2019, Biomaterials science.

[82]  S. Petrillo,et al.  The Crosstalk Between Osteodifferentiating Stem Cells and Endothelial Cells Promotes Angiogenesis and Bone Formation , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[83]  A. Chin,et al.  Establishment of xenografts of urological cancers on chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) to study metastasis , 2019, Precision clinical medicine.

[84]  A. Al Moustafa,et al.  A novel in ovo model to study cancer metastasis using chicken embryos and GFP expressing cancer cells , 2019, Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences.

[85]  R. Langer,et al.  The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay as a Three-dimensional Model to Study Autophagy in Cancer Cells. , 2019, Bio-protocol.

[86]  F. Tamanoi,et al.  Patient Derived Chicken Egg Tumor Model (PDcE Model): Current Status and Critical Issues , 2019, Cells.

[87]  J. Fellenberg,et al.  Optimization of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay as reliable in vivo model for the analysis of osteosarcoma , 2019, PloS one.

[88]  Wenwen Chen,et al.  Engineering human islet organoids from iPSCs using an organ-on-chip platform. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[89]  J. Coll,et al.  The pyrrolopyrimidine colchicine‐binding site agent PP‐13 reduces the metastatic dissemination of invasive cancer cells in vitro and in vivo , 2019, Biochemical pharmacology.

[90]  V. Babuška,et al.  Fabrication of Scaffolds for Bone-Tissue Regeneration , 2019, Materials.

[91]  K. Schicho,et al.  Photobiomodulation (PBM) promotes angiogenesis in-vitro and in chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[92]  J. Buschmann,et al.  Characterization and in ovo vascularization of a 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffold with different extracellular matrix coatings under perfusion culture , 2018, Biology Open.

[93]  J. Kanczler,et al.  Remodelling of human bone on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken egg: De novo bone formation and resorption , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[94]  F. Tamanoi,et al.  Chick chorioallantoic membrane assay as an in vivo model to study the effect of nanoparticle-based anticancer drugs in ovarian cancer , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[95]  V. Sée,et al.  Optimising the chick chorioallantoic membrane xenograft model of neuroblastoma for drug delivery , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[96]  J. Kanczler,et al.  * The Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay for Biomaterial Testing in Tissue Engineering: A Short-Term In Vivo Preclinical Model. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[97]  H. Stephan,et al.  Characterization of etoposide- and cisplatin-chemoresistant retinoblastoma cell lines , 2017, Oncology reports.

[98]  P. Albers,et al.  Applying the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay to study treatment approaches in urothelial carcinoma. , 2017, Urologic oncology.

[99]  V. Labas,et al.  Investigating proteins and proteases composing amniotic and allantoic fluids during chicken embryonic development , 2017, Poultry science.

[100]  T. Blunk,et al.  Development of volume‐stable adipose tissue constructs using polycaprolactone‐based polyurethane scaffolds and fibrin hydrogels , 2016, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[101]  Robert Langer,et al.  A decade of progress in tissue engineering , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[102]  J. Kanczler,et al.  The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for the study of human bone regeneration: a refinement animal model for tissue engineering , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[103]  P. Hassan,et al.  Citrate-functionalized hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for pH-responsive drug delivery , 2016 .

[104]  Weiwei Xiang,et al.  Structure and hemodynamics of vascular networks in the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken. , 2016, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[105]  N. Sugimoto,et al.  Disintegrin targeting of an αvβ3 integrin-over-expressing high-metastatic human osteosarcoma with echistatin inhibits cell proliferation, migration, invasion and adhesion in vitro , 2016, Oncotarget.

[106]  S. Dhara,et al.  A Simple Approach for an Eggshell-Based 3D-Printed Osteoinductive Multiphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffold. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[107]  R. Vishnubalaji,et al.  Transplantation of human neonatal foreskin stromal cells in ex vivo organotypic cultures of embryonic chick femurs , 2016, Saudi journal of biological sciences.

[108]  S. Bersini,et al.  A 3D vascularized bone remodeling model combining osteoblasts and osteoclasts in a CaP nanoparticle-enriched matrix. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[109]  Arman Zaharil Mat Saad,et al.  Chitosan: A Promising Marine Polysaccharide for Biomedical Research , 2016, Pharmacognosy reviews.

[110]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Angiogenic Potential of Human Neonatal Foreskin Stromal Cells in the Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model , 2015, Stem cells international.

[111]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay: A 3D Animal Model for Study of Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2015, PloS one.

[112]  Q. Zhu,et al.  Co-substitution of carbonate and fluoride in hydroxyapatite: Effect on substitution type and content , 2015, Frontiers of Materials Science.

[113]  Emma L. Smith,et al.  The Effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and Transforming Growth Factor-β3 on Bone Development in an Ex Vivo Organotypic Culture System of Embryonic Chick Femora , 2015, PloS one.

[114]  B. Slotman,et al.  Optimal treatment scheduling of ionizing radiation and sunitinib improves the antitumor activity and allows dose reduction , 2015, Cancer medicine.

[115]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Egg-in-Cube: Design and Fabrication of a Novel Artificial Eggshell with Functionalized Surface , 2015, PloS one.

[116]  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska,et al.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering , 2014, Angiogenesis.

[117]  J. Chan,et al.  The inhibition of miR-21 promotes apoptosis and chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[118]  M. Perelman,et al.  Chitosan , 2014 .

[119]  J. A. Panadero,et al.  Fatigue prediction in fibrin poly-ε-caprolactone macroporous scaffolds. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[120]  J. Kanczler,et al.  A new take on an old story: chick limb organ culture for skeletal niche development and regenerative medicine evaluation. , 2013, European cells & materials.

[121]  Abdul Samad Khan,et al.  Synthesis and characterizations of a fluoride-releasing dental restorative material. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[122]  S. Eick,et al.  Hyaluronic Acid as an adjunct after scaling and root planing: a prospective randomized clinical trial. , 2013, Journal of periodontology.

[123]  Arun K Iyer,et al.  Combination of siRNA-directed Gene Silencing With Cisplatin Reverses Drug Resistance in Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[124]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane for in vivo investigation of tissue-engineered construct biocompatibility. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[125]  Z. Qian,et al.  Injectable and thermo-sensitive PEG-PCL-PEG copolymer/collagen/n-HA hydrogel composite for guided bone regeneration. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[126]  Emma L. Smith,et al.  A novel approach for studying the temporal modulation of embryonic skeletal development using organotypic bone cultures and microcomputed tomography. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[127]  N. Katrancioglu,et al.  The antiangiogenic effects of levosimendan in a CAM assay. , 2012, Microvascular research.

[128]  S. Portal-Nuñez,et al.  Role of angiogenesis on bone formation. , 2012, Histology and histopathology.

[129]  Felicitas Genze,et al.  Comparison of In Vitro- and Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM)-Culture Systems for Cryopreserved Medulla-Contained Human Ovarian Tissue , 2012, PloS one.

[130]  M. Ferretti,et al.  Osteocyte Apoptosis and Absence of Bone Remodeling in Human Auditory Ossicles and Scleral Ossicles of Lower Vertebrates: A Mere Coincidence or Linked Processes? , 2012, Calcified Tissue International.

[131]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[132]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[133]  Jonathan T Butcher,et al.  An ex-ovo chicken embryo culture system suitable for imaging and microsurgery applications. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[134]  Neil A. Sharkey,et al.  Biomimetic bone mechanotransduction modeling in neonatal rat femur organ cultures: structural verification of proof of concept , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[135]  Domenico Ribatti,et al.  The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane in the Study of Angiogenesis and Metastasis: The CAM assay in the study of angiogenesis and metastasis , 2010 .

[136]  H. Jennissen,et al.  Chick ex ovo culture and ex ovo CAM assay: how it really works. , 2009, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[137]  Erin M. Conn,et al.  Evaluation of metastatic and angiogenic potentials of human colon carcinoma cells in chick embryo model systems , 2009, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[138]  James P. Quigley,et al.  Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model systems to study and visualize human tumor cell metastasis , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[139]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Angiogenic activity of multiple myeloma endothelial cells in vivo in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay is associated to a down-regulation in the expression of endogenous endostatin , 2008, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[140]  J. Kanczler,et al.  Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. , 2008, European cells & materials.

[141]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Combined Therapeutic Effects of Vinblastine and Rapamycin on Human Neuroblastoma Growth, Apoptosis, and Angiogenesis , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[142]  Andries Zijlstra,et al.  Unexpected effect of matrix metalloproteinase down-regulation on vascular intravasation and metastasis of human fibrosarcoma cells selected in vivo for high rates of dissemination. , 2005, Cancer research.

[143]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Synergistic inhibition of human neuroblastoma-related angiogenesis by vinblastine and rapamycin , 2005, Oncogene.

[144]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[145]  D. Uskoković,et al.  New biocomposite [biphasic calcium phosphate/ poly-DL-lactide-co-glycolide/biostimulative agent] filler for reconstruction of bone tissue changed by osteoporosis , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[146]  A. Bikfalvi,et al.  VEGF coordinates interaction of pericytes and endothelial cells during vasculogenesis and experimental angiogenesis , 2004, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[147]  M Epple,et al.  A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[148]  Jackelyn A. Alva,et al.  Selective Binding of Lectins to Embryonic Chicken Vasculature , 2003, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[149]  W. Higuchi,et al.  Effect of Fluoride Pretreatment on the Solubility of Synthetic Carbonated Apatite , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[150]  Andries Zijlstra,et al.  A quantitative analysis of rate-limiting steps in the metastatic cascade using human-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2002, Cancer research.

[151]  P H Burri,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane capillary bed: A useful target for studying angiogenesis and anti‐angiogenesis in vivo , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[152]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Inhibition of neuroblastoma‐induced angiogenesis by fenretinide , 2001 .

[153]  D. Mooney,et al.  Hydrogels for tissue engineering. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[154]  F. Leighton,et al.  Histology and ultrastructure of the chorioallantoic membrane of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[155]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[156]  A. Rück,et al.  Characterization of the chick chorioallantoic membrane model as a short-term in vivo system for human skin , 1999, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[157]  W. Yu,et al.  Requirement for Specific Proteases in Cancer Cell Intravasation as Revealed by a Novel Semiquantitative PCR-Based Assay , 1998, Cell.

[158]  Takuma Sasaki,et al.  A Chick Embryo Model for Metastatic Human Prostate Cancer , 1998, European Urology.

[159]  P. Parsons-Wingerter,et al.  A novel assay of angiogenesis in the quail chorioallantoic membrane: stimulation by bFGF and inhibition by angiostatin according to fractal dimension and grid intersection. , 1998, Microvascular research.

[160]  A. Zapata,et al.  Appearance and development of lymphoid cells in the chicken (Gallus gallus) caecal tonsil , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[161]  K. Isselbacher,et al.  Early events of metastasis in the microcirculation involve changes in gene expression of cancer cells. Tracking mRNA levels of metastasizing cancer cells in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. , 1997, The American journal of pathology.

[162]  H. DeLuca,et al.  Calcium uptake by chorioallantoic membrane: effects of vitamins D and K. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[163]  M. Packard Mobilization of shell calcium by the chick chorioallantoic membrane in vitro. , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[164]  R. Tuan,et al.  Regulation of extraembryonic calcium mobilization by the developing chick embryo. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[165]  N. Ledinko,et al.  Effects of retionoids on invasion of organ cultures of chick chorioallantoic membrane by adenovirus transformed cells , 1985, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology.

[166]  M. Lukic,et al.  Immunological capacity of the chicken embryo. I. Relationship between the maturation of lymphoid tissues and the occurrence of cell-mediated immunity in the developing chicken embryo. , 1975, Immunology.

[167]  B. Longenecker,et al.  In ovo assay for Marek's disease virus and turkey herpesvirus , 1975, Infection and immunity.

[168]  C. Steeg,et al.  Lymphoid stem cell identification in the developing thymus and bursa of fabricius of the chick , 1973, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[169]  J. Folkman Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[170]  W. Russell,et al.  The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique , 1960 .

[171]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1951, Journal of morphology.

[172]  Ahmad Baroutaji,et al.  Tissue Engineering Concept , 2021 .

[173]  P. Lazarovici,et al.  Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Angiogenesis: 2. The Quail Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[174]  S. Saule,et al.  Evaluation of Tumor Cell Invasiveness In Vivo: The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[175]  R. Pathak,et al.  The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as a versatile patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platform for precision medicine and preclinical research. , 2018, American journal of cancer research.

[176]  D. Ribatti The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane , 2018 .

[177]  S. Abolmaali,et al.  miR-21, An Oncogenic Target miRNA for Cancer Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms and Recent Advancements in Chemo and Radio-resistance. , 2017, Current gene therapy.

[178]  P. Crespo,et al.  The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as an in vivo Model to Study Metastasis , 2016 .

[179]  J. Fisher,et al.  Effect of prevascularization on in vivo vascularization of poly(propylene fumarate)/fibrin scaffolds. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[180]  Yu Qin,et al.  STAT3-regulated exosomal miR-21 promotes angiogenesis and is involved in neoplastic processes of transformed human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2016, Cancer letters.

[181]  Aaalac Accredited Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) , 2016 .

[182]  Mariana A. Branco Polyurethane-based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration , 2015 .

[183]  D. Ribatti,et al.  Differential expression of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic molecules in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane and selected organs during embryonic development. , 2013, The International journal of developmental biology.

[184]  S. Przyborski,et al.  Alvetex®: polystyrene scaffold technology for routine three dimensional cell culture. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[185]  J. Weis,et al.  Histology of human glioblastoma transplanted on chicken chorioallantoic membrane. , 2009, Medicina.

[186]  A. Veiga-Lopez,et al.  Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model: a useful tool to study short-term transplantation of cryopreserved human ovarian tissue. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[187]  Milica Radisic,et al.  Cardiac tissue engineering using perfusion bioreactor systems , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[188]  Marco Presta,et al.  The gelatin sponge–chorioallantoic membrane assay , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[189]  W. Scheuer,et al.  Quantification of human Alu sequences by real-time PCR – an improved method to measure therapeutic efficacy of anti-metastatic drugs in human xenotransplants , 2004, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[190]  S. Mañes,et al.  Quantitative determination of tumor cell intravasation in a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay , 2004, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[191]  M. Bravo,et al.  Antiproliferative effect of topic hyaluronic acid gel. Study in gingival biopsies of patients with periodontal disease. , 2002, Histology and histopathology.