In massive open online courses, peer discussion is a scalable solution for offering interactive and engaging learning experiences to a large number of students. On the other hand, the quality of communication mediated through online discussion tools, such as discussion forums, is far less expressive than that of face-to-face communication. As a solution, I present RichReview, a multi-modal annotation system through which distant students can exchange ideas using versatile combinations of voice, text, and pointing gestures. A series of lab and deployment studies of RichReview promised that the expressive multimedia mixture and lightweight audio browsing feature help students better understand commentators? intention. For the large-scale deployment, I redesigned RichReview as a web applet in edX?s courseware framework. By deploying the system at scale, I will investigate (1) the optimal group assignment scheme that maximizes overall diversities of group members, (2) educational data mining applications based on user-generated rich discussion data, and (3) the impact of the rich discussion to students? retention of knowledge. Throughout these studies, I will argue that a multi-modal anchored digital document annotation system enables rich online peer discussion at scale.
[1]
Nicholas Chen,et al.
RichReview: blending ink, speech, and gesture to support collaborative document review
,
2014,
UIST.
[2]
Nicholas Chen,et al.
RichReview++: Deployment of a Collaborative Multi-modal Annotation System for Instructor Feedback and Peer Discussion
,
2016,
CSCW.
[3]
Nicholas Chen,et al.
TextTearing: opening white space for digital ink annotation
,
2013,
UIST.
[4]
David Bargeron,et al.
Supporting interaction outside of class: anchored discussions vs. discussion boards
,
2002,
CSCL.
[5]
Mark S. Ackerman,et al.
Successful classroom deployment of a social document annotation system
,
2012,
CHI.
[6]
Michael S. Bernstein,et al.
PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance
,
2015,
L@S.
[7]
Wilmot Li,et al.
Content-based tools for editing audio stories
,
2013,
UIST.
[8]
Michael S. Bernstein,et al.
Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes
,
2015,
CSCW.
[9]
Jonathan Grudin,et al.
Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces
,
1988,
CSCW '88.