Aeroelastic behavior of launcher thermal insulation panel, accounting for various aerodynamic and structural models

Versatile Thermal Insulation panels, have been introduced for the first time with U.S. space launchers during the ’60, and immediately represented an element of high complexity, due the wide range of design parameters and the difficult operating conditions. Cases of flutter affecting VTI panels, have been observed since the first applications, stimulating the development of theories able to predict the phenomenon with sufficient accuracy. Numerical study of the panel flutter, has led to the development of different structural and aerodynamic models, useful for investigate this aeroelastic stability. The quasi-steady Piston Theory formulation may be applied only above M = 1.5, reducing the study capability to the supersonic range. This work proposes an un-steady formulation of the Piston Theory, derived by Vedeneev, aiming to extend its range of validity also for 1.3 < M < 1.5. Various comparison between these aerodynamic theories, have been carried out in order to underline the main differences in the previous range of Mach and in the accuracy with which the critical conditions are detected. Hand in hand, have been tested different structural models, of increasing complexity, based on 1D and 2D formulation, and also panels with a more advanced structure, multi-layer and sandwich and for last, a typical VTI configuration consists of a semi-circle sandwich panel. Using Shell models such as Equivalent Single Layer or Layer Wise, you may observe relevant variations in final results, highlighting the necessity of more complex structural models in Multi-Layered panels.

[1]  E. Dowell Nonlinear oscillations of a fluttering plate. II. , 1966 .

[2]  Holt Ashley,et al.  Piston Theory-A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician , 1956 .

[3]  C. HUNSAKER,et al.  THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION OF FLUTTER OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLAT PANELS WITH ONE SURFACE EXPOSED TO SUPERSONIC POTENTIAL FLOW , 2000 .

[4]  T. R. Lall Interstage adapter panel flutter on Atlas- Centaur AC-2, AC-3, and AC-4 vehicles , 1965 .

[5]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  A Beam Formulation with Shell Capabilities , 2010 .

[6]  Atsushi Hashimoto,et al.  Effects of Turbulent Boundary Layer on Panel Flutter , 2009 .

[7]  J. Reddy Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells : theory and analysis , 1996 .

[8]  By I. E. GAERICKand FLUTTER AND OSCILLATING AIR-FORCE CALCULATIONS FOR AN AIRFOIL IN A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SUPERSONIC FLOW , 1997 .

[9]  V. V. Bolotin,et al.  Nonconservative problems of the theory of elastic stability , 1963 .

[10]  V. V. Vedeneev,et al.  Experimental observation of single-mode panel flutter in a supersonic gas flow , 2009 .

[11]  V. V. Vedeneev,et al.  Panel flutter at low supersonic speeds , 2012 .

[12]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VISCOUS AEROELASTIC SOLVER FOR NONLINEAR PANEL FLUTTER , 2002 .

[13]  E. Dowell Panel flutter - A review of the aeroelastic stability of plates and shells , 1970 .

[14]  E. H. Dowell Panel flutter, NASA SPACE VEHICLE DESIGN CRITERIA (STRUCTURES) , 1972 .

[15]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Refined beam elements with only displacement variables and plate/shell capabilities , 2012 .

[16]  Gaetano Giunta,et al.  Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories , 2011 .

[17]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Plates and Shells for Smart Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories for Modeling and Analysis , 2011 .

[18]  E. Carrera,et al.  Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation , 2010 .

[19]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Modeling and analysis , 1978 .

[20]  E. Carrera,et al.  Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries , 2010 .

[21]  John W. Miles,et al.  The Potential Theory of Unsteady Supersonic Flow , 1959 .

[22]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Generalized aerodynamic forces on a flexible plate undergoing transient motion in a shear flow with an application to panel flutter , 1970 .