SDI normalization and alternatives

Abstract Estimating the fouling potential is a prerequisite for controlling membrane fouling in reverse osmosis systems. Two different tests are routinely used to that end: the Silt Density Index (SDI) and the Modified Fouling Index (MFI0.45). SDI test, however, has disadvantages which make it unreliable. One disadvantage is that no linear relationship exists between SDI and the colloidal concentration in the water. Besides that, the SDI is not based on a filtration model. Finally, the SDI is not corrected for the testing condition parameters such as temperature, pressure and membrane properties. The SDI test is simple and does not require advanced professional skills, but the above mentioned disadvantages make it unreliable. This work offers practical tools to resolve these disadvantages, such as a slide tool to calculate the SDI from the measured collection times. It also proposes a normalized SDI (SDI + ), and offers a line chart and slide wheel charts for this conversion, thus correcting for different test conditions and membrane resistance. Finally, this paper introduces a new fouling index. This volume-based SDI, SDI_v, compares the initial flow rate with the flow rate after filtering the standard volume. It has a linear relationship to the particle concentration if complete blocking is the dominant fouling mechanism during the test, and is independent of testing conditions and membrane resistance. The mathematical model and experimental results show that SDI_v eliminates most of the disadvantages of the traditional SDI. The SDI_v is the second fouling index developed at the University of Twente, 30 years after the MFI0.45.

[1]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  Colloidal fouling of RO membranes: an overview of key issues and efforts to develop improved prediction techniques , 2005 .

[2]  D. Vial,et al.  The use of microfiltration membranes for seawater pre-treatment prior to reverse osmosis membranes , 2003 .

[3]  A. Pihlajamäki,et al.  Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements , 1994 .

[4]  A. Nahrstedt,et al.  New insights into silt density index and modified fouling index measurements , 2008 .

[5]  Mohammad Nurul Alam Hawlader,et al.  An experiment with different pretreatment methods , 2003 .

[6]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer , 1994 .

[7]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effects of membrane pore geometry on fouling behavior during yeast cell microfiltration , 2006 .

[8]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Silt Density Index and Modified Fouling Index relation, and effect of pressure, temperature and membrane resistance , 2011 .

[9]  J. C. Schippers,et al.  The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water , 1980 .

[10]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[11]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  The influence of membrane properties on the Silt Density Index , 2011 .

[12]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[13]  D. Vial,et al.  Comparison of three pilot studies using Microza® membranes for Mediterranean seawater pre-treatment , 2003 .

[14]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[15]  Seungkwan Hong,et al.  Combined influence of membrane surface properties and feed water qualities on RO/NF mass transfer, a pilot study. , 2005, Water research.

[16]  Helge Toutenburg,et al.  Linear models : least squares and alternatives , 1999 .

[17]  R. Ziel,et al.  Quantification of the pore size distribution (porosity profiles) in microfiltration membranes by SEM, TEM and computer image analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Using SDI, SDI+ and MFI to evaluate fouling in a UR/RO desalination pilot plant , 2012 .

[19]  M. Jekel,et al.  Zeta-potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane in single salt solutions , 2000 .

[20]  Veronique Bonnelye,et al.  Reverse osmosis on open intake seawater: pre-treatment strategy , 2004 .

[21]  Mika Mänttäri,et al.  Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH , 2006 .

[22]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Effect of testing conditions and filtration mechanisms on SDI , 2011 .

[23]  Ben H.L. Betlem,et al.  Dynamic optimization of a dead-end filtration trajectory: Blocking filtration laws , 2006 .

[24]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  An assessment of the Silt Density Index based on RO membrane colloidal fouling experiments with iron oxide particles , 2003 .