Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge

Intellectual capital statements are ‘new’ forms of reporting whose object is knowledge management activities. Based on 17 firms’ work to develop intellectual capital statements, this paper analyses them as managerial technologies making knowledge amenable to intervention. Aspects of actor-network-theory are mobilised to suggest that the intellectual capital statement is a centre of translation, which mobilises knowledge management via three interrelated elements: knowledge narratives, visualisations and numbers. Intellectual capital statements report on the mechanisms put in place to make knowledge manageable. Writing intellectual capital is a local story, which often concerns making knowledge collective and a process of allowing it to be oriented towards organisational ends. In such a story, knowledge is about a firm’s capabilities and abilities to make a difference to a user. When writing an intellectual capital statement, firms locate employees, customers, processes and technologies and orient them towards a user. However, the statement as such is a means of ‘dis-locating’ knowledge resources making them amenable to intervention. There are certain broad types of intervention that allows a classification of strategies of intervention to be proposed. These terms are portfolio management, improvement activities and productivity. Such forms of intervention circumscribe the aspiration to transform knowledge from something internal to the person into something that is the effect of a collective arrangement. They allow—through intellectual capital statements—the dark, tacit knowing of individuals to come into the open space of calculation and action at a distance. # 2001 Published by Elsevier

[1]  J. Mouritsen Driving Growth: Economic Value Added Versus Intellectual Capital , 1998 .

[2]  P. H. Sullivan Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value from Innovation , 1998 .

[3]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[4]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[5]  J. O. Urmson,et al.  How to Do Things with Words@@@The William James Lectures , 1963 .

[6]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry , 1992 .

[7]  Trevor J Williams,et al.  Powershift: Knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st century , 1991 .

[8]  J. Mouritsen,et al.  Intellectual Capital Statements and Knowledge Management: ‘Measuring’, ‘Reporting’, ‘Acting’ , 1999 .

[9]  Guje Sevón,et al.  Organizational Imitation in Identity Transformation , 1996 .

[10]  Barbara Czarniawska Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity , 1997 .

[11]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[12]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[13]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[14]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[15]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[16]  N. Bontis Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[17]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[18]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies , 2001 .

[19]  B. Latour We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[20]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[21]  R. Petty,et al.  INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LITERATURE REVIEW: MEASUREMENT, REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[22]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The politics of explanation: An alternative , 1988 .

[23]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[24]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[25]  G. Petrash Dow's journey to a knowledge value management culture , 1996 .

[26]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[27]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Upsizing The Individual In The Downsized Organization: Managing In The Wake Of Reengineering, Globalization, And Overwhelming Technological Change , 1994 .

[28]  L. Edvinsson Developing intellectual capital at Skandia , 1997 .

[29]  J. Boudreau,et al.  MEASURING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL: LEARNING FROM FINANCIAL HISTORY , 1997 .

[30]  Angelo Ditillo,et al.  Intellectual Capital ‐ Navigating in the New Business Landscape , 1998 .

[31]  D. Ulrich Intellectual Capital = Competence x Commitment , 1998 .