Accuracy requirements and uncertainties in radiotherapy: a report of the International Atomic Energy Agency

Abstract Background: Radiotherapy technology continues to advance and the expectation of improved outcomes requires greater accuracy in various radiotherapy steps. Different factors affect the overall accuracy of dose delivery. Institutional comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programs should ensure that uncertainties are maintained at acceptable levels. The International Atomic Energy Agency has recently developed a report summarizing the accuracy achievable and the suggested action levels, for each step in the radiotherapy process. Overview of the report: The report seeks to promote awareness and encourage quantification of uncertainties in order to promote safer and more effective patient treatments. The radiotherapy process and the radiobiological and clinical frameworks that define the need for accuracy are depicted. Factors that influence uncertainty are described for a range of techniques, technologies and systems. Methodologies for determining and combining uncertainties are presented, and strategies for reducing uncertainties through QA programs are suggested. The role of quality audits in providing international benchmarking of achievable accuracy and realistic action levels is also discussed. Recommendations: The report concludes with nine general recommendations: (1) Radiotherapy should be applied as accurately as reasonably achievable, technical and biological factors being taken into account. (2) For consistency in prescribing, reporting and recording, recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements should be implemented. (3) Each institution should determine uncertainties for their treatment procedures. Sample data are tabulated for typical clinical scenarios with estimates of the levels of accuracy that are practically achievable and suggested action levels. (4) Independent dosimetry audits should be performed regularly. (5) Comprehensive quality assurance programs should be in place. (6) Professional staff should be appropriately educated and adequate staffing levels should be maintained. (7) For reporting purposes, uncertainties should be presented. (8) Manufacturers should provide training on all equipment. (9) Research should aid in improving the accuracy of radiotherapy. Some example research projects are suggested.

[1]  H. Suit,et al.  The Gray Lecture 2001: coming technical advances in radiation oncology. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Luc Beaulieu,et al.  The evolution of brachytherapy treatment planning. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  David S Followill,et al.  Independent Evaluations of IMRT through the Use of an Anthropomorphic Phantom , 2006, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[4]  J. Palta,et al.  Uncertainties in External Beam Radiation Therapy , 2011 .

[5]  J. Williamson,et al.  Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology". , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Richard Pötter,et al.  Image guided, adaptive, accelerated, high dose brachytherapy as model for advanced small volume radiotherapy. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  A. Dutreix When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy? , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  On target : ensuring geometric accuracy in radiotherapy , 2008 .

[9]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[10]  A Wambersie,et al.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy? , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Joanna Izewska,et al.  Analysis of uncertainties in the IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit system , 2008 .

[12]  André Wambersie,et al.  What accuracy is required and can be achieved in radiation therapy (review of radiobiological and clinical data) , 2001 .

[13]  J. Malicki,et al.  Physics and technology in ESTRO and in Radiotherapy and Oncology: past, present and into the 4th dimension. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Christopher Moore,et al.  Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.