STATUS OF STUDIES ON FOSSIL MARINE MAMMALS

A 30-year renaissance in research on fossil marine mammals has brought advances on several fronts and suggests potential directions for future study. Gingerich and Russell have described Pakicetus, the most primitive archaeocete cetacean. Mchedlidze has described a diverse assemblage of late Oligocene/early Miocene cetaceans from the Caucasus and Georgia, S.S.R. Barnes and Fordyce, respectively, have outlined sequences of fossil cetacean assemblages in the northeast and southwest Pacific. Much remains to be done on origin and definition of cetacean suborders, diversification and systematics of families, and relationships among infra-familial taxa. New material has been recovered of the most primitive desmostylians, and other new specimens, especially ones from Japan studied by Inuzuka and others, give a relatively complete picture of their anatomy. Material now exists for phylogenetic analysis. Domning has proposed a phyletic lineage of the sirenian subfamily Hydro-damalinae and has outlined patterns of Late Cenozoic manatee evolution. With Morgan and Ray he reviewed Eocene sirenians in the northwest Atlantic. Numerous new specimens are being actively studied in attempts to reassess relationships within the Sirenia. Mitchell and Tedford described the most primitive otariid, Enaliarctos. Repenning and Tedford reviewed the otarioids. The primitive taxa and their origin near or in the amphicynodontine ursids have been identified. The zoogeography of true seals, the phocids, has been analyzed recently by Repenning, Ray and Grigorescu, and by de Muizon. Most taxa are based on a few fragmentary specimens, and much work needs to be done on basic descriptions, interspecific comparisons and phyletic analysis. However, major progress has been made in the southern hemisphere through description of extensive new materials from Peru and South Africa. Many important phylogenetic gaps in the fossil record of marine mammals have been filled recently, and further advances continue at a rapid rate. Studies of zoogeography, functional anatomy and paleoecology, in addition to phylogeny, are coming into their own and promise an exciting series of discoveries in the coming years.

[1]  R. Savage.  Review of Early Sirenia , 1976 .

[2]  C. Ray.  Geography of Phocid Evolution , 1976 .

[3]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Find of a nearly complete late Weichselian polar bear skeleton, Ursus maritimus Phipps, at Finnoy, southwestern Norway , 1983 .

[4]  J. Sprent.  Ascaridoid nematodes of sirenians—a new species in the Senegal manatee , 1983, Journal of Helminthology.

[5]  F. Szalay.  ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF FUNCTION OF THE MESONYCHID CONDYLARTH FEEDING MECHANISM , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  L. Barnes.  Outline of Eastern North Pacific Fossil Cetacean Assemblages , 1976 .

[7]  R. Tedford,et al.  Relationship of Pinnipeds to Other Carnivores (Mammalia) , 1976 .

[8]  R. West.  MIDDLE EOCENE LARGE MAMMAL ASSEMBLAGE WITH TETHYAN AFFINITIES, GANDA KAS REGION, PAKISTAN , 1980 .

[9]  C. Ray.  Fossil Marine Mammals of Oregon , 1976 .

[10]  A. Sanders,et al.  Review of the Oligocene Cetacea , 1976 .

[11]  P. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  New Marine Eocene Vertebrates from Kutch , 1975 .

[12]  Remington Kellogg,et al.  The History of Whales-Their Adaptation to Life in the Water , 1928, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  K. Rothausen.  Die systematische Stellung der europäischen Squalodontidae (Odontoceti, Mamm.) , 1968 .

[14]  C. A. Repenning.  New Evidence for the Age of the Gubik Formation Alaskan North Slope , 1983, Quaternary Research.

[15]  R. Fordyce.  Rhabdosteid dolphins (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Middle Miocene, Lake Frome area, South Australia , 1983 .

[16]  D. Domning.  An Ecological Model for Late Tertiary Sirenian Evolution in the North Pacific Ocean , 1976 .

[17]  D. Domning.  Distribution and status of manatees Trichechus spp. Near the mouth of the amazon river, Brazil☆ , 1981 .

[18]  Frank H. Kilmer.  A new species of sea otter from the Late Pleistocene of northwestern California , 1972 .

[19]  Miklos Kretzoi.  A legidosebb magyar osemlos-lelet Le plus ancien vestige fossile de mammifere en Hongrie , 1953 .

[20]  E. Mitchell.  The Mio-Pliocene Pinniped Imagotaria , 1968 .

[21]  T. Oettingen-Spielberg,et al.  Die mitteleocänen Säugetiere von Ganda Kas bei Basal in Nordwest-Pakistan , 1958 .

[22]  R. Fordyce.  Whale evolution and Oligocene southern ocean environments , 1980 .

[23]  D. Domning.  Evolution of manatees; a speculative history , 1982 .

[24]  P. Gingerich,et al.  Origin of Whales in Epicontinental Remnant Seas: New Evidence from the Early Eocene of Pakistan , 1983, Science.

[25]  R. Fordyce.  A review of the Australian fossil Cetacea , 1982 .

[26]  L. V. Valen,et al.  MONOPHYLY OR DIPHYLY IN THE ORIGIN OF WHALES , 1968, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  J. Mead.  A fossil beaked whale (Cetacea; Ziphiidae) from the Miocene of Kenya , 1975 .

[28]  Ú. Árnason.  Localization of nucleolar organizing regions in pinniped karyotypes. , 2009, Hereditas.

[29]  A. Sahni,et al.  A new species of Protocetus (Cetacea) from the Middle Eocene of Kutch, western India , 1972 .

[30]  P. Satsangi,et al.  Fossil Sea Cow from the Tertiary of Kutch , 1978 .

[31]  T. Ozawa,et al.  A New Miocene Otarioid Seal from Japan , 1984 .

[32]  Ø. Wiig.  On the Relationship of Pinnipeds to Other Carnivores , 1983 .

[33]  R. Fordyce.  Systematics of the odontocete whale Agorophius pygmaeus and the family Agorophiidae (Mammalia; Cetacea) , 1981 .

[34]  C. Muizon.  Les relations phylogenetiques des Lutrinae (Mustelidae, Mammalia) , 1982 .

[35]  R. Kellogg.  A Miocene Long-beaked Porpoise from California , 1932 .

[36]  D. Domning.  Sea cows and sea grasses , 1981, Paleobiology.

[37]  J. Davies.  Pleistocene Geography and the Distribution of Northern Pinnipeds , 1958 .

[38]  J. E. King.  The Ohope skull ― a new species of Pleistocene sealion from New Zealand , 1983 .