Global shape processing: which parts form the whole?

Research suggests that detection of low-frequency radial frequency (RF) patterns involves global shape processing and that points of maximum curvature (corners) contribute more than points of minimum curvature (sides). However, this has only been tested with stimuli presented at the threshold of discriminability from a circle. We used RF pattern adaptation to (a) examine whether a supra-threshold RF pattern is processed as a global shape and (b) determine what the critical features are for representing its shape. We measured the perceived amplitude shift of an RF test pattern after prolonged exposure either to a higher amplitude pattern or to various combinations of its parts (concave maxima, convex maxima, inflections). We found greater shifts in perceived amplitude after adaptation to a "whole" pattern than after adaptation to its component parts, which alternated to produce equal net contrast. Furthermore, when adapting to specific parts of the shape in isolation, we found that each part generated a similar magnitude aftereffect. Although the whole is clearly greater than the sum of the parts, we find that concave maxima, convex maxima, and inflections contribute equally to global shape processing, a fact that is only apparent when using a supra-threshold appearance-based task.

[1]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings , 2000, Current Biology.

[2]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.

[3]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Cortical specialization for concentric shape processing , 2007, Vision Research.

[4]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Detection of convexity and concavity in context. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Elena Gheorghiu,et al.  Spatial properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects , 2008, Vision Research.

[6]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[7]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Luminance and contrast cues are integrated in global shape detection with contours , 2008, Vision Research.

[9]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[10]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Detection of contrast-defined shape , 2001 .

[11]  C. Connor,et al.  Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[13]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[14]  Jonathan W Peirce,et al.  Selective mechanisms for simple contours revealed by compound adaptation. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Narrow-band radial frequency shape channels revealed by sub-threshold summation , 2009, Vision Research.

[16]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space , 2002, Vision Research.

[17]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating shape after-effects with radial frequency patterns , 2007, Vision Research.

[19]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[20]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Object perception and masking: Contributions of sides and convexities , 2007, Vision Research.

[21]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[22]  D. Leopold,et al.  Visual adaptation to convexity in macaque area V4 , 2009, Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Bertamini,et al.  The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity when Judging Position , 2001, Perception.

[24]  R. Hess,et al.  Regional sensitivity for shape discrimination. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[25]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale integrative study , 2006, Cognition.

[26]  Renita A. Almeida,et al.  A new step towards understanding Embedded Figures Test performance in the autism spectrum: The radial frequency search task , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  A biologically plausible model of human radial frequency perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Wilson,et al.  Radial frequency adaptation reveals interacting contour shape channels , 2009, Vision Research.

[29]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detection of shape in radial frequency contours: Independence of local and global form information , 2007, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Peirce,et al.  Selective mechanisms for complex visual patterns revealed by adaptation , 2006, Neuroscience.

[31]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[32]  Kathy T Mullen,et al.  Comparison of color and luminance vision on a global shape discrimination task , 2002, Vision Research.

[33]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Curvature population coding for complex shapes in human vision , 2004, Vision Research.

[34]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Local and global contributions to shape discrimination , 2003, Vision Research.

[35]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Are judgements of circularity local or global? , 1999, Vision Research.

[36]  Jason Bell,et al.  Global contour shapes are coded differently from their local components , 2009, Vision Research.

[37]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Hysteresis between shape-defined categories , 2010 .

[38]  Frédéric J A M Poirier,et al.  A biologically plausible model of human shape symmetry perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[39]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Frances Wilkinson,et al.  Symmetry perception: a novel approach for biological shapes , 2002, Vision Research.

[41]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  C. Connor,et al.  Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Global shape coding for motion-defined radial-frequency contours , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  Elena Gheorghiu,et al.  Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[45]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[46]  Yi-Zhong Wang,et al.  Circular contour frequency in shape discrimination , 2002, Vision Research.

[47]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Radial frequency adaptation suggests polar-based coding of local shape cues , 2008, Vision Research.

[48]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms , 2008, Vision Research.

[49]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[50]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[51]  I. Biederman,et al.  Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition , 2006, Vision Research.

[52]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perception of head orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[53]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model , 2009, Vision Research.