Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity

We discuss how fragmentation of resources and habitat operate differently on species diversity across spatial scales, ranging from positive effects on local species coexistence to negative effect on intermediate spatial scales, to again positive effects on large spatial and temporal scales. Species with different size and mobility can be regulated by different processes at the same spatial scale, a principle that may contribute to diversity. Differences in species richness between local communities may be differentially regulated at larger spatial scales. This causal connection between local and regional processes has several practical conservation implications. We furthermore show that fractal geometry can be a valuable tool in the separation of the effects of habitat loss (percentage cover), habitat fragmentation (contiguity) and habitat (texture). Especially important may be the notion that the same effective degree of fragmentation can exist at in a very aggregated habitat (one big patch) and a very sparse, random landscape (many small, nearby patches). The geometric behaviour and covariance of these three basic parameters of spatial configuration needs further investigation. The fractal approach is tested using data on heathland habitat configuration and biodiversity in 36 Dutch landscapes of each 9 km � 9 km. Fractal geometry was indeed successful in separating the patterns of habitat loss from habitat fragmentation in a subset of the landscapes, despite covariance across all landscapes. Habitat loss and habitat fragmentation both had a negative effect on diversity of heathland breeding birds, while only habitat loss seemed to affect butterfly species richness. We conclude that fractal geometry seems to be a promising approach for linking population and community processes to landscape spatial structure. # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Steven W. Leavit.  Biogeochemistry, An Analysis of Global Change , 1998 .

[2]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Resource utilization scales and landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[4]  E. Chaneton,et al.  Disturbance effects on plant community diversity: spatial scales and dominance hierarchies , 1991, Vegetatio.

[5]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Interactions between the fractal geometry of landscapes and allometric herbivory , 1992 .

[6]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[7]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[8]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Local processes and regional patterns : appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals , 1999 .

[9]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[10]  Charles C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1959, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[12]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: edited by Robert E. Ricklefs and Dolph Schluter University of Chicago Press, 1993. $105.00 hbk, $35.00 pbk (414 pages) ISBN 0 226 71822 0/0 226 71823 9 , 1994 .

[13]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Spatial Aggregation and Neutral Models in Fractal Landscapes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[14]  C. Vos,et al.  Patterns and processes in a landscape under stress: the study area , 1993 .

[15]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for Conservation , 1992 .

[16]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[17]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation , 1997 .

[19]  H. Olff,et al.  Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity , 1999, Nature.

[20]  M. Pärtel,et al.  The species pool and its relation to species richness : evidence from Estonian plant communities , 1996 .

[21]  C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasion by Animals and Plants , 1960 .

[22]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[23]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  J. Blair,et al.  The Keystone Role of Bison in North American Tallgrass Prairie , 1999 .

[25]  Claire C. Vos,et al.  Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment , 2012, Springer Netherlands.

[26]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  The utility of fractal geometry in landscape design , 1991 .

[27]  J. Langer,et al.  Dendrites, Viscous Fingers, and the Theory of Pattern Formation , 1989, Science.

[28]  C. S. Holling.  Cross-Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[29]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[30]  J. Blair,et al.  The Keystone Role of Bison in North American Tallgrass Prairie Bison increase habitat heterogeneity and alter a broad array of plant, community, and ecosystem processes , 1999 .