Aerothermodynamic Optimization of Earth Entry Blunt Body Heat Shields for Lunar and Mars Return

Title of Document: AEROTHERMODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF EARTH ENTRY BLUNT-BODY HEAT SHIELDS FOR LUNAR AND MARS RETURN Joshua E. Johnson Doctor of Philosophy, 2009 Directed By: Professor Mark J. Lewis Department of Aerospace Engineering A differential evolutionary algorithm has been executed to optimize the hypersonic aerodynamic and stagnation-point heat transfer performance of Earth entry heat shields for Lunar and Mars return manned missions with entry velocities of 11 and 12.5 km/s respectively. The aerothermodynamic performance of heat shield geometries with lift-to-drag ratios up to 1.0 is studied. Each considered heat shield geometry is composed of an axial profile tailored to fit a base cross section. Axial profiles consist of spherical segments, spherically blunted cones, and power laws. Heat shield cross sections include oblate and prolate ellipses, rounded-edge parallelograms, and blendings of the two. Aerothermodynamic models are based on modified Newtonian impact theory with semi-empirical correlations for convection and radiation. Multi-objective function optimization is performed to determine optimal trade-offs between performance parameters. Objective functions consist of minimizing heat load and heat flux and maximizing down range and cross range. Results indicate that skipping trajectories allow for vehicles with L/D = 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 at lunar return flight conditions to produce maximum cross ranges of 950, 1500, and 3000 km respectively before Qs,tot increases dramatically. Maximum cross range increases by ~20% with an increase in entry velocity from 11 to 12.5 km/s. Optimal configurations for all three lift-to-drag ratios produce down ranges up to approximately 26,000 km for both lunar and Mars return. Assuming a 10,000 kg mass and L/D = 0.27, the current Orion configuration is projected to experience a heat load of approximately 68 kJ/cm 2 for Mars return flight conditions. For both L/D = 0.3 and 0.5, a 30% increase in entry vehicle mass from 10,000 kg produces a 20-30% increase in Qs,tot. For a given L/D, highly-eccentric heat shields do not produce greater cross range or down range. With a 5 g deceleration limit and L/D = 0.3, a highly oblate cross section with an eccentricity of 0.968 produces a 35% reduction in heat load over designs with zero eccentricity due to the eccentric heat shield’s greater drag area that allows the vehicle to decelerate higher in the atmosphere. In this case, the heat shield’s drag area is traded off with volumetric efficiency while fulfilling the given set of mission requirements. Additionally, the high radius-of-curvature of the spherical segment axial profile provides the best combination of heat transfer and aerodynamic performance for both entry velocities and a 5 g deceleration limit. AEROTHERMODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF EARTH ENTRY BLUNTBODY HEAT SHIELDS FOR LUNAR AND MARS RETURN

[1]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Aerothermodynamic Optimization of Reentry Heat Shield Shapes for a Crew Exploration Vehicle , 2007 .

[2]  P. H. Rose,et al.  Stagnation Point Heat-Transfer Measurements in Dissociated Air , 1958 .

[3]  E. R. Hillje.  Entry flight aerodynamics from Apollo mission AS-202 , 1967 .

[4]  Chul B. Park,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of generalized bent biconic bodies for aero-assisted, orbital-transfer vehicles , 1983 .

[5]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Aerodynamic requirements of a manned Mars aerobraking transfer vehicle , 1990 .

[6]  William C. Rochelle,et al.  Stagnation-point heat-transfer rate predictions at aeroassist flight conditions , 1992 .

[7]  R. E. Smith,et al.  Trajectory optimization for an Apollo-type vehicle under entry conditions encountered during lunar return , 1967 .

[8]  W. C. Moseley,et al.  Stability Characteristics of the Apollo Command Module , 1967 .

[9]  K. J. Weilmuenster,et al.  Simplified curve fits for the thermodynamic properties of equilibrium air , 1986 .

[10]  P. C. Ting,et al.  Aerothermodynamic environments for Mars entry, Mars return, and lunar return aerobraking missions , 1990 .

[11]  Frank J. Regan.  Re-entry vehicle dynamics , 1984 .

[12]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  Direct-Entry, Aerobraking, and Lifting Aerocapture for Human-Rated Lunar Return Vehicles , 2006 .

[13]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[14]  R Micol John.  Simulation of Real-Gas Effects on Pressure Distributions for Aeroassist Flight Experiment Vehicle and Comparison With Prediction , 1992 .

[15]  Marcus S. Murbach.  SCRAMP: The Development of an Advanced Planetary Probe From CFD to Re-entry Test Flight , 2005 .

[17]  J. C. Tannehill,et al.  Improved curve fits for the thermodynamic properties of equilibrium air suitable for numerical computation using time-dependent or shock-capturing methods, part 1 , 1974 .

[18]  E. R. Hillje.  Entry aerodynamics at lunar return conditions obtained from the flight of Apollo 4 /AS-501/ , 1969 .

[19]  E. V. Zoby,et al.  Effects of Corner Radius on Stagnation-point Velocity Gradients on Blunt Axisymmetric Bodies , 1966 .

[20]  Gene P. Menees,et al.  Aerothermodynamics of transatmospheric vehicles , 1986 .

[21]  G. E. Kaattari.  A method for predicting shock shapes and pressure distributions for a wide variety of blunt bodies at zero angle of attack , 1968 .

[22]  D. J. Shapland,et al.  A configuration for re-entry from mars missions using aerobraking. , 1965 .

[23]  Donn B. Kirk,et al.  Aerodynamic Behavior of the Viking Entry Vehicle: Ground Test and Flight Results , 1978 .

[24]  Joshua E. Johnson,et al.  Coupled Entry Heat Shield/Trajectory Optimization for Lunar Return , 2008 .

[25]  R. C. Ried,et al.  An AOTV aeroheating and thermal protection study , 1984 .

[26]  William Willcockson,et al.  Mars Pathfinder Heatshield Design and Flight Experience , 1999 .

[27]  Man Rai,et al.  Towards a Hybrid Aerodynamic Design Procedure Based on Neural Networks and Evolutionary Methods , 2002 .

[28]  W. C. Moseley,et al.  Aerodynamic stability characteristics of the Apollo command module , 1968 .

[29]  Joshua E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Optimal Earth Entry Heat Shield/ Trajectory Configurations , 2008 .

[30]  Reuben R. Rohrschneider,et al.  Entry System Options for Human Return from the Moon and Mars , 2007 .

[31]  H A Hazen,et al.  THE MECHANICS OF FLIGHT. , 1893, Science.

[32]  W. D. Goodrich,et al.  The aerothermodynamic environment of the Apollo command module during superorbital entry , 1972 .

[33]  J. Gielis.  A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[34]  R. S. Crowder,et al.  Apollo entry aerodynamics. , 1969 .

[35]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Aerodynamic Stability of Reentry Heat Shield Shapes for a Crew Exploration Vehicle , 2006 .

[36]  Joshua Elijah Johnson.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION OF NON-SPHERICAL, BLUNT-BODY HEAT SHIELDS FOR A PLANETARY ENTRY VEHICLE , 2006 .

[37]  Chul Park,et al.  Aerothermodynamics of manned Mars missions , 1989 .

[38]  Harold Masursky,et al.  On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet , 1985 .

[39]  William L. Wells.  Measured and predicted aerodynamic coefficients and shock shapes for Aeroassist Flight Experiment (AFE) configuration , 1989 .

[40]  P. Levine,et al.  Factors influencing the design and performance of mars entry vehicles. , 1965 .

[41]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Effects of Hypersonic Cruise Trajectory Optimization Coupled with Airbreathing Vehicle Design , 2006 .

[42]  Peter H. Rose,et al.  Laminar Heat Transfer Around Blunt Bodies in Dissociated Air , 1959 .

[43]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Earth aerobraking strategies for manned return from Mars , 1992 .

[44]  R. C. Ried,et al.  Radiative heating to the Apollo command module: Engineering prediction and flight measurement , 1972 .

[45]  Michael E. Tauber,et al.  Heatshielding problems of planetary entry - A review , 1999 .

[46]  John David Anderson,et al.  Introduction to Flight , 1985 .

[47]  G. Chrusciel,et al.  Theoretical method for calculating aerodynamic characteristics of spherically blunted cones , 1968 .

[48]  F. R. Riddell,et al.  Theory of Stagnation Point Heat Transfer in Dissociated Air , 1958 .

[49]  R. K. Ursem.  Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[50]  Wiley J. Larson,et al.  Human spaceflight : mission analysis and design , 2007 .

[51]  G Wilmoth Richard,et al.  Mars Pathfinder Rarefied Aerodynamics: Computations and Measurements , 1998 .

[52]  Chul Park,et al.  Stagnation-Point Radiation for Apollo 4 - A Review and Current Status , 2001 .

[53]  Mark J. Lewis,et al.  Aerothermodynamics of a Parashield Re-Entry Vehicle , 1998 .

[54]  U. M. Lovelace.  Charts Depicting Kinematic and Heating Parameters for a Ballistic Reentry at Speeds of 26,000 to 45,000 Feet Per Second , 1961 .

[55]  William M. Congdon,et al.  Mars Pathfinder entry temperature data, aerothermal heating, and heatshield material response , 1998 .

[56]  D. B. Lee,et al.  Apollo experience report: Aerothermodynamics evaluation , 1972 .

[57]  M. E. Tauber,et al.  Stagnation-point radiative heating relations for earth and Mars entries , 1991 .

[58]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Re-entry Capsule , 2003 .

[59]  Jeremy R. Rea.  Orion Entry Flight Corridor Analysis , 2008 .

[60]  Prabhakar Subrahmanyam,et al.  Computational Investigation and Simulation of the Aerothermodynamics of Reentry Vehicles , 2005 .

[61]  J. Suttles,et al.  Curve fits of predicted inviscid stagnation-point radiative heating rates, cooling factors, and shock standoff distances for hyperbolic earth entry , 1974 .

[62]  D. Drob,et al.  Nrlmsise-00 Empirical Model of the Atmosphere: Statistical Comparisons and Scientific Issues , 2002 .

[63]  H. Miura,et al.  Aerobrake design studies for manned Mars missions , 1991 .

[64]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST). Volume 3: Programmer's manual , 1975 .

[65]  John R. Micol,et al.  Hypersonic lateral and directional stability characteristics of aeroassist flight experiment configuration in air and CF4 , 1993 .

[66]  C. C. Horstman,et al.  Free-flight measurements of aerodynamic viscous effects on lifting re-entry bodies. , 1967 .

[67]  Chul Park,et al.  Optimum Configuration of High-Lift Aeromaneuvering Orbital Transfer Vehicles in Viscous Flow , 1985 .

[68]  James J Buglia,et al.  Preliminary studies of manned satellites. Wingless configuration - Nonlifting , 1958 .

[69]  De Rose.  Trim attitude, lift and drag of the Apollo command module with offset center-of-gravity positions at Mach numbers to 29 , 1969 .

[70]  Man Mohan Rai,et al.  ROBUST OPTIMAL AERODYNAMIC DESIGN USING EVOLUTIONARY METHODS AND NEURAL NETWORKS , 2004 .