The Polytope-Collision Problem

The Orbit Problem consists of determining, given a matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}$ and vectors $x,y\in \mathbb{R}^d$, whether there exists $n\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $A^n=y$. This problem was shown to be decidable in a seminal work of Kannan and Lipton in the 1980s. Subsequently, Kannan and Lipton noted that the Orbit Problem becomes considerably harder when the target $y$ is replaced with a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^d$. Recently, it was shown that the problem is decidable for vector-space targets of dimension at most three, followed by another development showing that the problem is in PSPACE for polytope targets of dimension at most three. In this work, we take a dual look at the problem, and consider the case where the initial vector $x$ is replaced with a polytope $P_1$, and the target is a polytope $P_2$. Then, the question is whether there exists $n\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $A^n P_1\cap P_2\neq \emptyset$. We show that the problem can be decided in PSPACE for dimension at most three. As in previous works, decidability in the case of higher dimensions is left open, as the problem is known to be hard for long-standing number-theoretic open problems. Our proof begins by formulating the problem as the satisfiability of a parametrized family of sentences in the existential first-order theory of real-closed fields. Then, after removing quantifiers, we are left with instances of simultaneous positivity of sums of exponentials. Using techniques from transcendental number theory, and separation bounds on algebraic numbers, we are able to solve such instances in PSPACE.

[1]  Peter Bro Miltersen,et al.  2 The Task of a Numerical Analyst , 2022 .

[2]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  Polynomial-time algorithm for the orbit problem , 1986, JACM.

[3]  Henri Cohen,et al.  A course in computational algebraic number theory , 1993, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[4]  Mark Braverman,et al.  Termination of Integer Linear Programs , 2006, CAV.

[5]  V. Pan Optimal and nearly optimal algorithms for approximating polynomial zeros , 1996 .

[6]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  The orbit problem is decidable , 1980, STOC '80.

[7]  Terence Tao Structure and Randomness: Pages from Year One of a Mathematical Blog , 2008 .

[8]  Joël Ouaknine,et al.  On the Complexity of the Orbit Problem , 2013, J. ACM.

[9]  George E. Collins,et al.  Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition , 1975 .

[10]  Terence Tao,et al.  Structure and randomness , 2008 .

[11]  Gisbert Wüstholz,et al.  Logarithmic forms and group varieties. , 1993 .

[12]  Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier,et al.  Oeuvres de Fourier: Solution d'une question particulière du calcul des inégalités , 2013 .

[13]  Joël Ouaknine,et al.  Ultimate Positivity is Decidable for Simple Linear Recurrence Sequences , 2013, ICALP.

[14]  Michael A. Harrison,et al.  Lectures on linear sequential machines , 1969 .

[15]  GenaimSamir,et al.  Ranking Functions for Linear-Constraint Loops , 2014 .

[16]  D. S. Arnon,et al.  Algorithms in real algebraic geometry , 1988 .

[17]  A. Tarski A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry , 2023 .

[18]  M. Mignotte Some Useful Bounds , 1983 .

[19]  Joël Ouaknine,et al.  The orbit problem in higher dimensions , 2013, STOC '13.

[20]  Joel Ouaknine,et al.  On Termination of Integer Linear Loops , 2015, SODA.

[21]  Joël Ouaknine,et al.  The Polyhedron-Hitting Problem , 2014, SODA.

[22]  James Renegar,et al.  On the Computational Complexity and Geometry of the First-Order Theory of the Reals, Part I: Introduction. Preliminaries. The Geometry of Semi-Algebraic Sets. The Decision Problem for the Existential Theory of the Reals , 1992, J. Symb. Comput..