Advanced Durability and Damage Tolerance Design and Analysis Methods for Composite Structures: Lessons Learned from NASA Technology Development Programs

Aerospace vehicles are designed to be durable and damage tolerant. Durability is largely an economic life-cycle design consideration whereas damage tolerance directly addresses the structural airworthiness (safety) of the vehicle. However, both durability and damage tolerance design methodologies must address the deleterious effects of changes in material properties and the initiation and growth of microstructural damage that may occur during the service lifetime of the vehicle. Durability and damage tolerance design and certification requirements are addressed for commercial transport aircraft and NASA manned spacecraft systems. The state-of-the-art in advanced design and analysis methods is illustrated by discussing the results of several recently completed NASA technology development programs. These programs include the NASA Advanced Subsonic Technology Program demonstrating technologies for large transport aircraft and the X-33 hypersonic test vehicle demonstrating technologies for a single-stage-to-orbit space launch vehicle.

[1]  C Jegley Dawn,et al.  Structural Testing of a Stitched/Resin Film Infused Graphite-Epoxy Wing Box , 2001 .

[2]  E Harris Charles,et al.  A Progressive Damage Methodology for Residual Strength Predictions of Notched Composite Panels , 1998 .

[3]  Charles E. Harris,et al.  A continuum damage model of fatigue-induced damage in laminated composites , 1988 .

[4]  J. H. Starnes,et al.  Low-velocity impact damage in graphite-fiber reinforced epoxy laminates , 1981 .

[5]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Effect of Low-Velocity Impact Damage on the Compressive Strength of Graphite-Epoxy Hat-Stiffened Panels. , 1976 .

[6]  E Harris Charles,et al.  Progressive Damage Analysis of Laminated Composite (PDALC)-A Computational Model Implemented in the NASA COMET Finite Element Code , 1996 .

[7]  Kunigal N. Shivakumar,et al.  Three-dimensional elastic analysis of a composite double cantilever beam specimen , 1988 .

[8]  William B. Avery,et al.  Impact damage resistance of composite fuselage structure, part 1 , 1992 .

[9]  Wade C. Jackson,et al.  The Use of Impact Force as a Scale Parameter for the Impact Response of Composite Laminates , 1993 .

[10]  Melvin S. Anderson,et al.  Recent Developments in the Design, Testing and Impact-Damage Tolerance of Stiffened Composite Panels , 1980 .

[11]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES, JUDGED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 2002 .

[12]  M. Handzic 5 , 1824, The Banality of Heidegger.

[13]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Analytical Methodology for Predicting the Onset of Widespread Fatigue Damage in Fuselage Structure , 1996 .

[14]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Effect of Impact Damage and Holes on the Compressive Strength of a Graphite/Epoxy Laminate , 1979 .

[15]  Donald F. Adams,et al.  Mechanical properties of several neat polymer matrix materials and unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced composites , 1989 .

[16]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates , 1998 .

[17]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Failure characteristics of graphite-epoxy structural components loaded in compression , 1983 .

[18]  Charles E. Harris,et al.  A Cumulative Damage Model for Continuous Fiber Composite Laminates with Matrix Cracking and Interply Delaminations , 1988 .

[19]  Charles E. Harris,et al.  Internal State Variable Approach for Predicting Stiffness Reductions in Fibrous Laminated Composites with Matrix Cracks , 1989 .

[20]  Harold G. Bush,et al.  Correlation of Structural Analysis and Test Results for the McDonnell Douglas Stitched/RFI All-Composite Wing Stub Box , 1996 .

[21]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Effect of impact damage on the compression strength of filamentary-composite hat-stiffened panels , 1978 .

[22]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES , 1998 .

[23]  Jr James H. Starnes,et al.  An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art for the Design and Manufacturing of Large Composite Structures for Aerospace Vehicles , 2001 .