Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes

Significance There is generally conflict when members of different social groups, such as racial, ethnic, or religious groups, come in contact in the same geographic area. This phenomenon is commonly observed across a variety of settings. However, the cause of such conflict is poorly understood: Some theorists have argued that contact between groups is insufficient to cause conflict and that, under certain conditions contact may lead to improved intergroup relations. Although most theories of contact propose that repeated contact between individuals is important to the disposition of intergroup attitudes, experimenting on the effects of repeated contact has proven difficult. Here, I report a randomized controlled trial that assigns repeated intergroup contact between members of different ethnic groups. The contact results in exclusionary attitudes toward the outgroup. The effect of intergroup contact has long been a question central to social scientists. As political and technological changes bring increased international migration, understanding intergroup contact is increasingly important to scientific and policy debates. Unfortunately, limitations in causal inference using observational data and the practical inability to experimentally manipulate demographic diversity has limited scholars’ ability to address the effects of intergroup contact. Here, I report the results of a randomized controlled trial testing the causal effects of repeated intergroup contact, in which Spanish-speaking confederates were randomly assigned to be inserted, for a period of days, into the daily routines of unknowing Anglo-whites living in homogeneous communities in the United States, thus simulating the conditions of demographic change. The result of this experiment is a significant shift toward exclusionary attitudes among treated subjects. This experiment demonstrates that even very minor demographic change causes strong exclusionary reactions. Developed nations and politically liberal subnational units are expected to experience a politically conservative shift as international migration brings increased intergroup contact.

[1]  J. Sullivan,et al.  The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship , 2009 .

[2]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The person-positivity bias. , 1983 .

[3]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[4]  Jonathan Rieder Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn Against Liberalism , 1985 .

[5]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[6]  G. Facchini,et al.  Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  A. Alesina,et al.  The Size of Nations , 2003 .

[8]  C. McGarty,et al.  Categorization, accentuation and social judgement , 1988 .

[9]  C. Boehm,et al.  Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior , 1999 .

[10]  Daniel N. Posner The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[11]  R. Dahl,et al.  Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. , 1962 .

[12]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Empathy or Antipathy ? The Impact of Diversity , 2007 .

[13]  J. E. Hanley Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[14]  Macartan Humphreys,et al.  Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision? , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice , 1997 .

[17]  V. O. Key,et al.  Southern Politics In State and Nation , 1984 .

[18]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Global Pattern Formation and Ethnic/Cultural Violence , 2007, Science.

[19]  J. Heckman,et al.  Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[20]  H. D. Forbes Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis , 1997 .

[21]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  T. Pettigrew Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  V. Smith,et al.  Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games , 2000 .

[24]  Gary King,et al.  The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation , 2009, 0910.3752.

[25]  R. Putnam,et al.  E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture , 2007 .

[26]  P. Kasinitz Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn Against Liberalism , 1985, Telos.

[27]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The Oxford handbook of political psychology , 2013 .

[28]  T. Edsall,et al.  Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics , 1991 .

[29]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[30]  T. Vanhanen,et al.  Domestic Ethnic Conflict and Ethnic Nepotism: A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[31]  Cliff Brown,et al.  Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis , 1998 .

[32]  Ray C. Rist,et al.  Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation , 1984 .

[33]  M. Brewer,et al.  13 – Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation , 1984 .

[34]  K. Peng,et al.  White selves: conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  T. Edsall,et al.  Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics , 1991 .

[36]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[37]  Jake Bowers,et al.  Covariate balance in simple stratified and clustered comparative studies , 2008, 0808.3857.

[38]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[39]  D. Hopkins Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[40]  I. Shapiro,et al.  Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics , 2010 .

[41]  Edward H. Kaplan,et al.  Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics: The illusion of learning from observational research , 2004 .

[42]  Jack L. Walker,et al.  Race in the City. , 1975 .

[43]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2012 .

[44]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  I. Mysterud Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior , 1999 .

[46]  H. Tajfel Cognitive aspects of prejudice , 1969, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[47]  C. Manski Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects , 1989 .

[48]  R. MacLean,et al.  Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast , 2006, Nature.

[49]  J. Oliver The Paradoxes of Integration: Race, Neighborhood, and Civic Life in Multiethnic America , 2010 .

[50]  S. Bowles Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors? , 2009, Science.

[51]  L. Bobo,et al.  Whites' opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? , 1983 .

[52]  Lee Sigelman,et al.  Race and Place: Race Relations in an American City , 2001 .