SCS-CN and GIS-based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali Watershed, Mahi River Basin, India

The Kali sub-watershed is situated in the semi-arid region of Gujarat, India and forms a part of the Mahi River Watershed. This watershed receives an average annual rainfall of 900mm mainly between July and September. Due to high runoff potential, evapo-transpiration and poor infiltration, drought like situation prevails in this area from December to June almost every year. In this paper, augmentation of water resource is proposed by construction of runoff harvesting structures like check dam, percolation pond, farm pond, well and subsurface dyke. The site suitability for different water harvesting structures is determined by considering spatially varying parameters like runoff potential, slope, fracture pattern and micro-watershed area. GIS is utilised as a tool to store, analyse and integrate spatial and attribute information pertaining to runoff, slope, drainage and fracture. The runoff derived by SCS-CN method is a function of runoff potential which can be expressed in terms of runoff coefficient (ratio between the runoff and rainfall) which can be classified into three classes, viz., high (>40%), moderate (20–40%) and low (<20%). In addition to IMSD, FAO specifications for water harvesting/recharging structures, parameters such as effective storage, rock mass permeability are herein considered to augment effective storage. Using the overlay and decision tree concepts in GIS, potential water harvesting sites are identified. The derived sites are field investigated for suitability and implementation. In all, the accuracy of the site selection at implementation level varies from 80–100%.

[1]  Marc Stieglitz,et al.  Advantages of a topographically controlled runoff simulation in a soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer model , 2002 .

[2]  A. Feldman,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling System , 1996 .

[3]  V. Singh,et al.  Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology , 2003 .

[4]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  KINEROS: A kinematic runoff and erosion model documentation and user manual , 1986 .

[5]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of the SCS-CN-Based Model Incorporating Antecedent Moisture , 2004 .

[6]  R. Minciardi,et al.  Integrating Meteosat satellite and rain-gauge information to estimate rainfall patterns , 1995 .

[7]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? , 2005 .

[8]  T. I. Eldho,et al.  An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method , 2007 .

[9]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[10]  V. Singh,et al.  SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield , 2006 .

[11]  S. A. Briggs,et al.  Fast maximum likelihood classification of remotely-sensed imagery , 1987 .

[12]  Connie Ko,et al.  GIS modeling for predicting river runoff volume in ungauged drainages in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  T. Jackson,et al.  Watershed scale temporal and spatial stability of soil moisture and its role in validating satellite estimates , 2004 .

[14]  Douglas M. Johnston,et al.  Runoff Volume Estimation Using GIS Techniques , 1990 .

[15]  John C. Gallant,et al.  TAPES-G: a grid-based terrain analysis program for the environmental sciences , 1996 .

[16]  K. Geetha,et al.  Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation , 2007 .

[17]  F. A. El-Awar,et al.  A hydro-spatial hierarchical method for siting water harvesting reservoirs in dry areas. , 2000 .

[18]  Russell S. Harmon,et al.  Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D , 2002 .

[19]  X. Wen,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of an experimental stratigraphy , 2005 .

[20]  Cheng-Haw Lee,et al.  A simple method of estimating rock mass porosity and permeability , 1990 .

[21]  Statistical Guidelines for Curve Number Generation , 2005 .

[22]  K. D. Durga Rao,et al.  Delineation of potential sites for water harvesting structures through remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Kali watershed, Gujarat, India , 2008 .

[23]  K. S. Prasad,et al.  Watersheds prioritisation using remote sensing techniques : a case study of the Mahbubnagar district, Andhra Pradesh, India , 1993 .

[24]  A. K. Lohani,et al.  Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) models , 2007 .

[25]  M. G. Chandrasekhar,et al.  Checkdam site selection using GIS approach , 1993 .

[26]  Mark Horan,et al.  A GIS-based approach for identifying potential runoff harvesting sites in the Thukela River basin, South Africa , 2007 .

[27]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[28]  V. Singh,et al.  Catchment area‐based evaluation of the AMC‐dependent SCS‐CN‐based rainfall–runoff models , 2005 .

[29]  An application of the distributed hydrologic model CASC2D to a tropical montane watershed , 2006 .

[30]  A. Roth,et al.  The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar , 2003 .

[31]  G. Mohan,et al.  A GIS based hydrogeomorphic approach for identification of site-specific artificial-recharge techniques in the Deccan Volcanic Province , 2005 .

[32]  D. S. Kumar,et al.  Spatial Decision Support System for Watershed Management , 2004 .

[33]  Jay R. Lund,et al.  Drought storage allocation rules for surface reservoir systems. , 2006 .