Survival Gains from First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the U.S., 1990-2015: Progress and Opportunities.

BACKGROUND Approximately 190,000 Americans are diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) annually, and about half have metastatic (Stage IV) disease. These patients have historically had poor survival prognosis, but several new therapies introduced since 2000 provide options for improved outcomes. The objectives of this study were to quantify survival gains from 1990, when best supportive care (BSC) only was standard, to 2015 and to estimate the impact of expanded use of systemic therapies in clinically appropriate patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a simulation model to estimate survival gains for patients with metastatic NSCLC from 1990-2015. Survival estimates were derived from major clinical trials and extrapolated to a lifetime horizon. Proportions of patients receiving available therapies were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and a commercial treatment registry. We also estimated gains in overall survival (OS) in scenarios in which systemic therapy use increased by 10% and 30% relative to current use. RESULTS From 1990-2015, one-year survival proportion increased by 14.1% and mean per-patient survival improved by 4.2 months (32,700 population life years). Increasing treated patients by 10% or 30% increased OS by 5.1 months (39,700 population life years) and 6.9 months (53,800 population life years), respectively. CONCLUSION Although survival remains poor in metastatic NSCLC relative to other common cancers, meaningful progress in per-patient and population-level outcomes has been realized over the past 25 years. These advances can be improved even further by increasing use of systemic therapies in the substantial proportion of patients who are suitable for treatment yet who currently receive BSC only. The Oncologist 2017;22:304-310 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Approximately 93,500 Americans are diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) annually. Historically, these patients have had poor survival prognosis, but newer therapies provide options for improved outcomes. This simulation modeling study quantified metastatic NSCLC survival gains from 1990-2015. Over this period, the one-year survival proportion and mean per-patient survival increased by 14.1% and 4.2 months, respectively. Though metastatic NSCLC survival remains poor, the past 25 years have brought meaningful gains. Additional gains could be realized by increasing systemic therapy use in the substantial proportion of patients who are suitable for treatment, yet currently receive only supportive care.

[1]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Noone,et al.  Receipt of chemotherapy among medicare patients with cancer by type of supplemental insurance. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  C. Goodman,et al.  PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators—a novel tool to measure progress in cancer treatments , 2015, Ecancermedicalscience.

[5]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Andreas Sashegyi,et al.  Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[7]  Sophie Sun,et al.  Less Toxic Chemotherapy Improves Uptake of All Lines of Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Population-Based Review , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[8]  Chun-Ming Tsai,et al.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Khuri,et al.  Real-world effectiveness of systemic agents approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis. , 2013, The oncologist.

[11]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Edelman,et al.  Chemotherapy and survival benefit in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Abbruzzese,et al.  F1000 highlights , 2009, JAMA.

[15]  M. Stokes,et al.  Trends and predictors of first-line chemotherapy use among elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[16]  Johan Vansteenkiste,et al.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Socinski,et al.  Randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatin-etoposide to carboplatin-paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Chemotherapy use, outcomes, and costs for older persons with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: evidence from surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Daniel Jones Anticancer drugs: To the rescue? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  David Harrington,et al.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Kris,et al.  Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens , 2000 .

[23]  J. Dancey,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  J. Crowley,et al.  Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  O. Brodin,et al.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials , 1995 .

[26]  S. Ramsey,et al.  Referral and treatment patterns among patients with stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2013, Journal of oncology practice.

[27]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.