Tracking Dynamic Team Activity

AI researchers are striving to build complex multi-agent worlds with intended applications ranging from the RoboCup robotic soccer tournaments, to interactive virtual theatre, to large-scale real-world battlefield simulations. Agent tracking - monitoring other agent's actions and inferring their higher-level goals and intentions - is a central requirement in such worlds. While previous work has mostly focused on tracking individual agents, this paper goes beyond by focusing on agent teams. Team tracking poses the challenge of tracking a team's joint goals and plans. Dynamic, real-time environments add to the challenge, as ambiguities have to be resolved in real-time. The central hypothesis underlying the present work is that an explicit team-oriented perspective enables effective team tracking. This hypothesis is instantiated using the model tracing technology employed in tracking individual agents. Thus, to track team activities, team models are put to service. Team models are a concrete application of the joint intentions framework and enable an agent to track team activities, regardless of the agent's being a collaborative participant or a non-participant in the team. To facilitate real-time ambiguity resolution with team models: (i) aspects of tracking are cast as constraint satisfaction problems to exploit constraint propagation techniques; and (ii) a cost minimality criterion is applied to constrain tracking search. Empirical results from two separate tasks in real-world, dynamic environments - one collaborative and one competitive - are provided.

[1]  Robert L. Shaw,et al.  Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering , 1985 .

[2]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Generalized Plan Recognition , 1986, AAAI.

[3]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[4]  Steven Minton,et al.  Solving Large-Scale Constraint-Satisfaction and Scheduling Problems Using a Heuristic Repair Method , 1990, AAAI.

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Modeling and Intelligent Tutoring , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Algorithms for Constraint-Satisfaction Problems: A Survey , 1992, AI Mag..

[7]  Gil Tidhar,et al.  Planned Team Activity , 1992, MAAMAW.

[8]  M. F. Mar,et al.  ModSAF Behavior Simulation and Control , 1993 .

[9]  Ken Pimentel,et al.  Virtual reality - through the new looking glass , 1993 .

[10]  Masaru Ishii,et al.  Cooperation by observation: the framework and basic task patterns , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Multi-Agent Mental-State Recognition and its Application to Air-Combat Modelling , 1994 .

[12]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Means-End Plan Recognition - Towards a Theory of Reactive Recognition , 1994, KR.

[13]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Interactive Simulation Environments , 1995, AI Mag..

[14]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Building Intelligent Pilots for Simulated Rotary Wing Aircraft , 1995 .

[15]  Milind Tambe,et al.  RESC: An Approach for Real-time, Dynamic Agent Tracking , 1995, IJCAI.

[16]  Mark Stefik,et al.  Introduction to knowledge systems , 1995 .

[17]  Milind Tambe Recursive Agent and Agent-Group Tracking in a Real-Time Dynamic Environment , 1995, ICMAS.

[18]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  RoboCup: The Robot World Cup Initiative , 1997, AGENTS '97.