Mergeable nervous systems for robots

Robots have the potential to display a higher degree of lifetime morphological adaptation than natural organisms. By adopting a modular approach, robots with different capabilities, shapes, and sizes could, in theory, construct and reconfigure themselves as required. However, current modular robots have only been able to display a limited range of hardwired behaviors because they rely solely on distributed control. Here, we present robots whose bodies and control systems can merge to form entirely new robots that retain full sensorimotor control. Our control paradigm enables robots to exhibit properties that go beyond those of any existing machine or of any biological organism: the robots we present can merge to form larger bodies with a single centralized controller, split into separate bodies with independent controllers, and self-heal by removing or replacing malfunctioning body parts. This work takes us closer to robots that can autonomously change their size, form and function.Robots that can self-assemble into different morphologies are desired to perform tasks that require different physical capabilities. Mathews et al. design robots whose bodies and control systems can merge and split to form new robots that retain full sensorimotor control and act as a single entity.

[1]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[2]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  Hormone-Inspired Self-Organization and Distributed Control of Robotic Swarms , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[3]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  Fault detection in autonomous robots based on fault injection and learning , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolutionary robotics , 2014, Evolutionary Intelligence.

[6]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Resilient Machines Through Continuous Self-Modeling , 2006, Science.

[7]  Eliseo Ferrante,et al.  Swarmanoid: A Novel Concept for the Study of Heterogeneous Robotic Swarms , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  c ○ 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Swarm-Bot: A New Distributed Robotic Concept , 2022 .

[9]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  Hormone-inspired adaptive communication and distributed control for CONRO self-reconfigurable robots , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Atsuko Takamatsu,et al.  Environment-dependent morphology in plasmodium of true slime mold Physarum polycephalum and a network growth model. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  George A. Bekey,et al.  AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control, by G.A. Bekey, MIT Press, 2005, xv + 577 pp., index, ISBN 0-262-02578-7, 25 pages of references (Hb. £35.95) , 2005, Robotica.

[12]  Satoshi Murata,et al.  Self-reconfigurable robots , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[13]  Anthony Westphal,et al.  Controlling a lamprey-based robot with an electronic nervous system , 2011 .

[14]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems , 2007 .

[15]  Anders Lyhne Christensen,et al.  SWARMORPH: Multirobot Morphogenesis Using Directional Self-Assembly , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  A. Takamatsu,et al.  Characterization of Adaptation by Morphology in a Planar Biological Network of Plasmodial Slime Mold , 2011 .

[17]  Zack J. Butler,et al.  Million Module March: Scalable Locomotion for Large Self-Reconfiguring Robots , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Luis Magdalena,et al.  An Open Localization and Local Communication Embodied Sensor , 2008, Sensors.

[19]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  From evolutionary computation to the evolution of things , 2015, Nature.

[20]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm , 2014, Science.

[21]  Anders Lyhne Christensen,et al.  Self-assembly strategies in a group of autonomous mobile robots , 2010, Auton. Robots.