Getting ready for Mars: How the brain perceives new simulated gravitational environments

On Earth, we are continually exposed to gravity: sensory signals are constantly integrated to form an internal model of gravity. However, it is unclear whether this internal model is fixed to Earth’s gravity or whether it can be applied to a new gravitational environment. Under terrestrial gravity, observers show a “gravitational bias” while judging the speed of falling versus rising objects, as they comply with the physical laws of gravity. We investigated whether this gravitational bias may be present when judging the speed of objects moving upwards or downwards in both virtual reality (VR)-simulated Earth gravity (9.81 m/s2) and Mars gravity (3.71 m/s2). Our results highlighted a gravitational bias in both Earth and Mars VR-simulated gravity: the speed of downwards movement was more precisely detected than the speed of upwards movement. Although the internal model of gravity has been built up under terrestrial gravity, it can quickly expand to novel non-terrestrial gravitational environments.

[1]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[2]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Does the brain model Newton's laws? , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Michael Jenkin,et al.  Enhancing visual cues to orientation: suggestions for space travelers and the elderly. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[4]  Welber Marinovic,et al.  Neural prediction of complex accelerations for object interception. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Maryam Khan,et al.  Human space exploration: neurosensory, perceptual and neurocognitive considerations , 2016 .

[6]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Meta-analytical definition and functional connectivity of the human vestibular cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  D Straumann,et al.  Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  L. Yardley.  Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Sensory vestibular contributions to constructing internal models of self-motion , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Representation of Visual Gravitational Motion in the Human Vestibular Cortex , 2005, Science.

[13]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  L.A. Wickman,et al.  Human performance considerations for a Mars mission , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  Jim Wilson.  Journey to Mars Overview , 2016 .

[16]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[17]  Mathias Pohl,et al.  Visual Representations , 2006, Human-Centered Visualization Environments.

[18]  D. Pérennou,et al.  Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  J. Lackner,et al.  Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Vincenzo Maffei,et al.  Multisensory Integration and Internal Models for Sensing Gravity Effects in Primates , 2014, BioMed research international.

[21]  Vincenzo Maffei,et al.  Visual gravitational motion and the vestibular system in humans , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[22]  P. Haggard,et al.  Up, Down, Near, Far: An Online Vestibular Contribution to Distance Judgement , 2017, PloS one.

[23]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Nuno Alexandre De Sá Teixeira.  The visual representations of motion and of gravity are functionally independent: Evidence of a differential effect of smooth pursuit eye movements , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Vincenzo Maffei,et al.  Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[27]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The weight of time: gravitational force enhances discrimination of visual motion duration. , 2011, Journal of Vision.

[28]  Marion Trousselard,et al.  Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Internal model of gravity for hand interception: parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic versus Vestibular Gravity Reception in Man , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.