Influence of point-of-sale tobacco displays and graphic health warning signs on adults: evidence from a virtual store experimental study.

OBJECTIVES We tested the impact of banning tobacco displays and posting graphic health warning signs at the point of sale (POS). METHODS We designed 3 variations of the tobacco product display (open, enclosed [not visible], enclosed with pro-tobacco ads) and 2 variations of the warning sign (present vs absent) with virtual store software. In December 2011 and January 2012, we randomized a national convenience sample of 1216 adult smokers and recent quitters to 1 of 6 store conditions and gave them a shopping task. We tested for the main effects of the enclosed display, the sign, and their interaction on urge to smoke and tobacco purchase attempts. RESULTS The enclosed display significantly lowered current smokers' (B = -7.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -13.20, -0.91; P < .05) and recent quitters' (Β = -6.00, 95% CI = -11.00, -1.00; P < .01) urge to smoke and current smokers' purchase attempts (adjusted odds ratio = 0.06; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.11; P < .01). The warning sign had no significant main effect on study outcomes or interaction with enclosed display. CONCLUSIONS These data show that POS tobacco displays influence purchase behavior. Banning them may reduce cues to smoke and unplanned tobacco purchases.

[1]  M. Wakefield,et al.  The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase. , 2008, Addiction.

[2]  Robert C. Hubal,et al.  How do varied populations interact with embodied conversational agents? Findings from inner-city adolescents and prisoners , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  T. Piasecki.  Relapse to smoking. , 2006, Clinical psychology review.

[4]  B. Carter,et al.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. , 1999, Addiction.

[5]  Louise M. Hassan,et al.  Support for removal of point-of-purchase tobacco advertising and displays: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada survey , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[6]  Amy C. Traylor,et al.  Cue reactivity in virtual reality: the role of context. , 2011, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  Wilma E Waterlander,et al.  The virtual supermarket: An innovative research tool to study consumer food purchasing behaviour , 2011, BMC public health.

[8]  Shannon M Farley,et al.  Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[9]  V. Shute,et al.  Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning: Flow and Grow , 2009 .

[10]  N. Rigotti,et al.  T REATMENT OF T OBACCO U SE AND D EPENDENCE , 2002 .

[11]  Richard W Pollay,et al.  More than meets the eye: on the importance of retail cigarette merchandising , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[12]  J. Hoek,et al.  How do tobacco retail displays affect cessation attempts? Findings from a qualitative study , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[13]  Hilary L. Copp,et al.  Using virtual reality to investigate complex and contextual cue reactivity in nicotine dependent problem drinkers. , 2011, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  Brenda K. Wiederhold,et al.  Experimental Application of Virtual Reality for Nicotine Craving through Cue Exposure , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  S. Baumann,et al.  Smoking cues in a virtual world provoke craving in cigarette smokers. , 2006, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[16]  R. Edwards,et al.  The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. , 2009, Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

[17]  Paul M. Cinciripini,et al.  Neural substrates of smoking cue reactivity: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  K. W. Harris,et al.  The Guide to Community Preventive Services What Works to Promote Health , 2006 .

[19]  J. Unger,et al.  An examination of trends in amount and type of cigarette advertising and sales promotions in California stores, 2002–2005 , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[20]  Lisa Henriksen,et al.  Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[21]  Jeremy C. Brooks,et al.  Virtual Reality Cue Reactivity Assessment in Cigarette Smokers , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  R. Donovan,et al.  The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on unplanned purchases: results from immediate postpurchase interviews , 2009, Tobacco Control.

[23]  M. Ferrer-García,et al.  Validation of smoking-related virtual environments for cue exposure therapy. , 2012, Addictive behaviors.

[24]  Annice E Kim,et al.  Influence of Tobacco Displays and Ads on Youth: A Virtual Store Experiment , 2013, Pediatrics.

[25]  M. Wakefield,et al.  Smoker sensitivity to retail tobacco displays and quitting: a cohort study. , 2010, Addiction.