Assistive peripheral prosthetic vision aids perception and mobility in outdoor environments: A virtual-reality simulation study

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) causes visual field (VF) constriction due to progressive loss of photoreceptors, typically from the retinal periphery to the fovea. Retinal prostheses offer vision restoration via electrode implantation and stimulation near the fovea, thereby eliciting articifial percepts, so-called phosphenes in the center VF. Although foveal photoreceptors can persist for prolonged periods of time, bionic therapy is usually restricted to stages of RP with complete vision loss. However, persons with RP experience mobility impairment from peripherally restricted VFs much earlier. Consequently, the amount of visual scanning necessary for navigation is increased, and maintaining a steady pace is challenging. Receiving a retinal implant at this early stage might be feasible. We investigated the potential of a peripheral visual prosthesis coexisting with central residual vision to facilitate scene perception and mobility. Simulating prosthetic and residual vision in a virtual mobility environment, we found that assistive phosphene layouts were associated with reductions in visual scanning-related head movements of up to 42.1%, body rotations of up to 30%, and up to 45% lower frequency of stopping when circumventing low-lying obstacles, pedestrians and following a path. Further research on early implantation of retinal prostheses for the peripheral VF is therefore advised.

[1]  L. E. Hallum,et al.  A quantitative analysis of head movement behaviour during visual acuity assessment under prosthetic vision simulation , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Joanne M Wood,et al.  Postural stability and gait among older adults with age-related maculopathy. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Towards an assistive peripheral visual prosthesis for long-term treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: evaluating mobility performance in immersive simulations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Hao Lei,et al.  What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation? , 2007, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  What areas of of the visual field are important for mobility in low vision patients , 1990 .

[6]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Simulated prosthetic visual fixation, saccade, and smooth pursuit , 2005, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Rizzo Update on Retinal Prosthetic Research: The Boston Retinal Implant Project , 2011, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[8]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  R. Gnanadesikan,et al.  Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. , 1968, Biometrika.

[10]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.

[11]  K. Turano,et al.  Direction of Gaze while Walking a Simple Route: Persons with Normal Vision and Persons with Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  W. Seiple,et al.  Abnormal Fixation in Individuals With Age-Related Macular Degeneration When Viewing an Image of a Face , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  Irene Gottlob,et al.  Physiology and pathology of eye–head coordination , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[14]  J. Wood,et al.  Influence of Presbyopic Corrections on Driving-Related Eye and Head Movements , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  The functional performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.