Experiential learning in high energy physics: a survey of students at the LHC

More than 36 000 students and post-docs will be involved until 2025 in research at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) mainly through international collaborations. To what extent they value the skills acquired? Do students expect that their learning experience will have an impact on their professional future? By drawing from earlier literature on experiential learning, we have designed a survey of current and former students at LHC. To quantitatively measure the students’ perceptions, we compare the salary expectations of current students with the assessment of those now employed in different jobs. Survey data are analysed by ordered logistic regression models, which allow multivariate statistical analyses with limited dependent variables. Results suggest that experiential learning at LHC positively correlates with both current and former students’ salary expectations. Those already employed clearly confirm the expectations of current students. At least two not mutually exclusive explanations underlie the results. First, the training at LHC is perceived to provide students valuable skills, which in turn affect the salary expectations; secondly, the LHC research experience per se may act as signal in the labour market. Respondents put a price tag on their learning experience, a ‘LHC salary premium’ ranging from 5% to 12% compared with what they would have expected for their career without such an experience at CERN.

[1]  Andrew J. Mason,et al.  Surveying college introductory physics students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving , 2016, 1608.08548.

[2]  T. Camporesi,et al.  A "LHC Premium" for Early Career Researchers? Perceptions from within , 2016, 1607.01941.

[3]  S. Forte,et al.  Forecasting the socio-economic impact of the Large Hadron Collider: A cost–benefit analysis to 2025 and beyond , 2016, 1603.00886.

[4]  B. Frick,et al.  The structure and determinants of expected and actual starting salaries of higher education students in Germany: identical or different? , 2016 .

[5]  M. Faheem,et al.  Graduates’ expectation gap: the role of employers and Higher Learning Institutes , 2015 .

[6]  C. D. Del Bo,et al.  Human Capital Formation at LHC: Survey Results , 2015 .

[7]  E. Sirtori,et al.  Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 , 2014 .

[8]  Linda Schweitzer,et al.  The gender gap in pre-career salary expectations: a test of five explanations , 2014 .

[9]  B. Penning,et al.  Snowmass 2013 Young Physicists Science and Career Survey Report , 2013, 1307.8080.

[10]  J. Guzmán.  Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[11]  S. Chong,et al.  Expectation gaps, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of fresh graduates: Roles of graduates, higher learning institutions and employers , 2011 .

[12]  Max Boisot,et al.  Collisions and Collaboration , 2011 .

[13]  Max Boisot,et al.  Collisions and Collaboration: The Organization of Learning in the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC , 2011 .

[14]  T. Nieminen,et al.  International research work experience of young females in physics , 2011, 1101.1758.

[15]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study. , 2010 .

[16]  Michele Pezzoni,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Academic Promotion: A Study on French and Italian Physicists , 2010 .

[17]  Michele Pezzoni,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Academic Promotion: A Study on French and Italian Physicists. NBER Working Paper No. 16341. , 2010 .

[18]  Mary Hogue,et al.  Gender Differences in Pay Expectations: The Roles of Job Intention and Self-View , 2010 .

[19]  V. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Graduates', university lecturers' and employers' perceptions towards employability skills , 2010 .

[20]  B. L. Roux,et al.  Multiple Correspondence Analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Rolf-Dieter Heuer,et al.  LEP - The Lord of the Collider Rings at CERN 1980-2000: The Making, Operation and Legacy of the World's Largest Scientific Instrument , 2009 .

[22]  Isabel Fernandez-Mateo,et al.  Cumulative Gender Disadvantage in Contract Employment1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  Physics Graduates in the Workforce: Does Physics Education Help? , 2008 .

[24]  Russell Tytler,et al.  The Usefulness of a Science Degree: The “lost voices” of science trained professionals , 2007 .

[25]  W. Wiesner,et al.  Are Men Always Picked Over Women? The Effects of Employment Equity Directives on Selection Decisions , 2007 .

[26]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  What does a physics undergraduate education give you? A perspective from Australian physics , 2007 .

[27]  B. Duffy,et al.  Comparing Data from Online and Face-to-face Surveys , 2005 .

[28]  T. Camporesi.  High-energy physics as a career springboard , 2001 .

[29]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Gender differences in pay satisfaction and pay expectations , 2000 .

[30]  Frank C. Harris,et al.  Factors affecting clients' project dispute resolution satisfaction in Hong Kong , 2000 .

[31]  Michael Greenacre,et al.  Correspondence analysis of square asymmetric matrices , 2000 .

[32]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  The effectiveness of the Dispute Resolution Advisor system: a critical appraisal , 1998 .

[33]  Martin Theus,et al.  Visualization of categorical data , 1997 .

[34]  M. W. Green,et al.  2. Handbook of the Logistic Distribution , 1991 .

[35]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[36]  H. Kaiser.  A NOTE ON GUTTMAN'S LOWER BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF COMMON FACTORS1 , 1961 .