Error estimation in a stochastic finite element method in electrokinetics

Input data to a numerical model are not necessarily well known. Uncertainties may exist both in material properties and in the geometry of the device. They can be due, for instance, to ageing or imperfections in the manufacturing process. Input data can be modelled as random variables leading to a stochastic model. In electromagnetism, this leads to solution of a stochastic partial differential equation system. The solution can be approximated by a linear combination of basis functions rising from the tensorial product of the basis functions used to discretize the space (nodal shape function for example) and basis functions used to discretize the random dimension (a polynomial chaos expansion for example). Some methods (SSFEM, collocation) have been proposed in the literature to calculate such approximation. The issue is then how to compare the different approaches in an objective way. One solution is to use an appropriate a posteriori numerical error estimator. In this paper, we present an error estimator based on the constitutive relation error in electrokinetics, which allows the calculation of the distance between an average solution and the unknown exact solution. The method of calculation of the error is detailed in this paper from two solutions that satisfy the two equilibrium equations. In an example, we compare two different approximations (Legendre and Hermite polynomial chaos expansions) for the random dimension using the proposed error estimator. In addition, we show how to choose the appropriate order for the polynomial chaos expansion for the proposed error estimator. C.

[1]  Thomas Henneron,et al.  Discrete finite element characterizations of source fields for volume and boundary constraints in electromagnetic problems , 2008 .

[2]  Hermann G. Matthies,et al.  Galerkin methods for linear and nonlinear elliptic stochastic partial differential equations , 2005 .

[3]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  W. Prager,et al.  Approximations in elasticity based on the concept of function space , 1947 .

[5]  Jan S. Hesthaven,et al.  Computational modeling of uncertainty in time-domain electromagnetics , 2005, Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005..

[6]  I. Babuska,et al.  Solving elliptic boundary value problems with uncertain coefficients by the finite element method: the stochastic formulation , 2005 .

[7]  O. L. Maître,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in CFD using polynomial chaos decomposition , 2006 .

[8]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Multi-Element Generalized Polynomial Chaos for Arbitrary Probability Measures , 2006, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Strain and stress computations in stochastic finite element methods , 2008 .

[10]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  A stochastic finite element procedure for moment and reliability analysis , 2006 .

[11]  B. Sudret,et al.  3-D Spectral Stochastic Finite Element Method in Electromagnetism , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Niels Bay,et al.  An experimental study determines the electrical contact resistance in resistance welding , 2005 .

[13]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Uncertainty propagation using Wiener-Haar expansions , 2004 .

[14]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Verification of stochastic models in uncertain environments using the constitutive relation error method , 2006 .

[15]  S. Rahman A polynomial dimensional decomposition for stochastic computing , 2008 .

[16]  Calculation of extra copper losses with imposed current magnetodynamic formulations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  A. Bossavit Whitney forms: a class of finite elements for three-dimensional computations in electromagnetism , 1988 .

[18]  B. Sudret,et al.  Current Calculation in Electrokinetics Using a Spectral Stochastic Finite Element Method , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[19]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Numerical Challenges in the Use of Polynomial Chaos Representations for Stochastic Processes , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..