Is it Self-Administration if the Computer Gives You Encouraging Looks?

The movie Kinsey opens with a scene of the great sex researcher being interviewed by one of his students. During the course of the interview, Kinsey not only reveals some surprising facts about his own sexual history, but also takes the opportunity to train the student in the fine art of interviewing. Much of the training concerns body language – eye gaze is important to indicate that you are listening, sitting far away creates a perception of distance, frowning will prevent the subject from relaxing. Kinsey's unfortunate student, however, has a hard time controlling his nonverbal behavior as the interview delves more and more deeply into the personal life of his mentor. Survey researchers have long worried about the unconscious effects of interviewer appearance, including nonverbal behaviors such as these, on the responses of survey interviewees. For this reason (as well as to reduce costs) various communication technologies that allow partial or total self-administration of the interview have been adopted by survey researchers in attempts to objectify the survey process. Self-administered paper and pencil questionnaires, the telephone, computer assisted self interviews and then the Web survey have been thought to hold the answer to the sorts of bias that might be introduced into surveys by the effects of the face-to-face contact of two humans in conversation. The telephone transmits only voice information about the interviewer, and other methods (in the text format most often used to present questionnaires) removes the interviewer altogether. A paradox exists, however, in the debate surrounding the use of these technologies. On the one hand, many researchers continue to

[1]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  SAME-GENDER SEX IN THE UNITED STATES IMPACT OF T-ACASI ON PREVALENCE ESTIMATES. , 2006, Public opinion quarterly.

[2]  Michael W. Link,et al.  Accessibility and acceptance of responsive virtual human technology as a survey interviewer training tool , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models: the impact of appearance on females' attitude toward engineering , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  J. Cassell,et al.  Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents , 2005 .

[5]  J. Cassell,et al.  SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITH EMBODIED CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS , 2005 .

[6]  Joel M. Moskowitz Assessment of Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Susceptibility among Youth Telephone Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews versus Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews , 2004 .

[7]  D. Currivan,et al.  Does Telephone Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing Improve the Accuracy of Prevalence Estimates of Youth Smoking? Evidence from the UMass Tobacco Study. , 2004, Public opinion quarterly.

[8]  M. F. Schober,et al.  Discourse Cues That Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions , 2004 .

[9]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[10]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry , 2003 .

[11]  Yukiko I. Nakano,et al.  Towards a Model of Face-to-Face Grounding , 2003, ACL.

[12]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Yukiko I. Nakano,et al.  Non-Verbal Cues for Discourse Structure , 2022 .

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Commun. Res..

[15]  Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra,et al.  Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: Interviewer–respondent interaction , 2000 .

[16]  Hao Yan Paired Speech and Gesture Generation in Embodied Conversational Agents , 2000 .

[17]  Joakim Gustafson,et al.  The august spoken dialogue system , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[18]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[19]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Predicting hyperarticulate speech during human-computer error resolution , 1998, Speech Commun..

[20]  J. Cassell,et al.  Modeling Gaze Behavior as a Function of Discourse Structure , 1998 .

[21]  Scott Prevost Modeling contrast in the generation and synthesis of spoken language , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[22]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[23]  H. Schuman,et al.  Pens and Polls in Nicaragua: An Analysis of the 1990 Preelection Surveys , 1992 .

[24]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates , 1990 .

[25]  Charles F. Cannell,et al.  Interviewers' Voices and Refusal Rates in Telephone Surveys , 1986 .

[26]  P. Miller Alternative Question Forms for Attitude Scale Questions in Telephone Interviews , 1984 .

[27]  Shelley Masion Rosenberg Bodily Communication , 1978 .

[28]  Howard Schuman,et al.  WHITE RESPONDENTS AND RACE-OF-INTERVIEWER EFFECTS , 1975 .

[29]  W. Goudy,et al.  INTERVIEW RAPPORT: DEMISE OF A CONCEPT , 1975 .

[30]  Ramon Henson,et al.  Effects of interviewer style and question form on reporting of automobile accidents , 1972 .

[31]  Jean M. Converse,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF BLACK AND WHITE INTERVIEWERS ON BLACK RESPONSES IN 1968 , 1971 .

[32]  A Study of Interviewer-Respondent Interaction in the Urban Employment Survey. Final Report. , 1969 .

[33]  B. Dohrenwend,et al.  Social Distance and Interviewer Effects , 1968 .

[34]  Fowler Fj,et al.  The influence of interviewer and respondent psychological and behavioral variables on the reporting in household interviews. , 1968, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[35]  C. Weiss VALIDITY OF WELFARE MOTHERS' INTERVIEW RESPONSES , 1968 .

[36]  J. Williams,et al.  INTERVIEWER ROLE PERFORMANCE: A FURTHER NOTE ON BIAS IN THE INFORMATION INTERVIEW , 1968 .

[37]  J. R. Hochstim A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from Households , 1967 .

[38]  A. Cicourel Method and measurement in sociology , 1965 .

[39]  J. Williams Interviewer-Respondent Interaction: A Study of Bias in the Information Interview * , 1964 .

[40]  David Riesman,et al.  AGE AND AUTHORITY IN THE INTERVIEW , 1961 .

[41]  John C. Leggett,et al.  Caste, Class, and Deference in the Research Interview , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  K. Athey,et al.  Two experiments showing the effect of the interviewer's racial background on responses to questionnaires concerning racial issues. , 1960 .

[43]  Shirley A. Star,et al.  Age and Sex in the Interview , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  C. F. Cannell,et al.  Interviewing in social research. , 1955 .

[45]  W. J. Cobb,et al.  Interviewing in social research , 1955 .

[46]  The Meaning of Opinion , 1948 .

[47]  D. Robinson,et al.  A Public Opinion Study of Anti-Semitism in New York City , 1945 .

[48]  D. Katz DO INTERVIEWERS BIAS POLL RESULTS , 1942 .