The Role of Holistic Processing in Judgments of Facial Attractiveness

Previous work has demonstrated that facial identity recognition, expression recognition, gender categorisation, and race categorisation rely on a holistic representation. Here we examine whether a holistic representation is also used for judgments of facial attractiveness. Like past studies, we used the composite paradigm to assess holistic processing (Young et al 1987, Perception 16 747–759). Experiment 1 showed that top halves of upright faces are judged to be more attractive when aligned with an attractive bottom half than when aligned with an unattractive bottom half. To assess whether this effect resulted from holistic processing or more general effects, we examined the impact of the attractive and unattractive bottom halves when upright halves were misaligned and when aligned and misaligned halves were presented upside-down. The bottom halves had no effect in either condition. These results demonstrate that the perceptual processes underlying upright facial-attractiveness judgments represent the face holistically. Our findings with attractiveness judgments and previous demonstrations involving other aspects of face processing suggest that a common holistic representation is used for most types of face processing.

[1]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces in Preschool Children and Adults , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  G. Rhodes.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Configural information in facial expression perception. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[5]  T. Valentine,et al.  Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  J. Langlois,et al.  Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad? , 2006, Social cognition.

[8]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Race Categorization Modulates Holistic Face Encoding , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human facial beauty , 1993, Human nature.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  When Facial Attractiveness is Only Skin Deep , 2004, Perception.

[12]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[14]  G. Hole.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[15]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[17]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Effect of face familiarity on age decision. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[18]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness , 2002 .

[19]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces? , 2006, Developmental science.

[20]  K. Grammer,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality , 2006 .

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[22]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[23]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Configural Information in Gender Categorisation , 2006, Perception.

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[25]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[26]  David I. Perrett,et al.  What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality , 2006 .

[27]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[29]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[30]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[34]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[35]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FITTING THE MIND TO THE WORLD: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects , 2022 .

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[38]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  P. Hancock,et al.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[40]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship , 2001 .